Advanced Aesthetic Rhinoplasty 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28053-5_75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthetic and Functional Restoration Using Dorsal Saddle-Shaped Medpor Implant in Secondary Rhinoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No extrusion or nasal deformity requiring revision was reported (4). In 14 patients who underwent revision rhinoplasty dorsal-shaped HDPP implants, success rates (excluding a single malposition) were high (13). In 32 subjects who underwent correction of traumatic nasal deformity, the overall aesthetic improvement rate was 90.6% after a mean follow-up period of 25.4 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…No extrusion or nasal deformity requiring revision was reported (4). In 14 patients who underwent revision rhinoplasty dorsal-shaped HDPP implants, success rates (excluding a single malposition) were high (13). In 32 subjects who underwent correction of traumatic nasal deformity, the overall aesthetic improvement rate was 90.6% after a mean follow-up period of 25.4 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%