2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthetic role of the surgically rebuilt inframammary fold for implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Farley et al, and Bogetti P also used interrupted absorbable subcuticular sutures for wound closure. 9,10 Considering all the above mentioned facts authors thought of interrupted absorbable subcuticular sutures where authors can have the benefits of interrupted nonabsorbable sutures and absorbable sutures secondly the same suture material used for subcutaneous sutures can be used for subcuticular sutures also; in our study authors used 3-0 polyglactin for subcutaneous as well as subcuticular suturing. Apart from cosmesis by this technique authors can avoid let opening of the whole wound for evacuation of haematoma or any collection.…”
Section: Mann-whitney U Testmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…8 Farley et al, and Bogetti P also used interrupted absorbable subcuticular sutures for wound closure. 9,10 Considering all the above mentioned facts authors thought of interrupted absorbable subcuticular sutures where authors can have the benefits of interrupted nonabsorbable sutures and absorbable sutures secondly the same suture material used for subcutaneous sutures can be used for subcuticular sutures also; in our study authors used 3-0 polyglactin for subcutaneous as well as subcuticular suturing. Apart from cosmesis by this technique authors can avoid let opening of the whole wound for evacuation of haematoma or any collection.…”
Section: Mann-whitney U Testmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Considering the recent trend towards implant-based reconstruction, non-autologus reconstruction provides several challenges to achieve good cosmetic results [5,6]. Aesthetic results are based on the essential features of a natural breast, including size, projection, upper pole contouring, lower pole fullness, ptosis, fold location, and symmetry [2,3,7]. Attaining superior cosmesis bears impact, as post-reconstruction analysis has linked patients' aesthetic scores and symmetry with patient satisfaction [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased patient awareness, expectations after breast reconstruction have increased manifold and assimilated towards that of the post-augmentation breast. The mainstay of breast reconstruction continues to be two stage tissue expander/implant (TE/I) based reconstructions, with aesthetic results hinging upon the creation of a natural breast shape with upper pole fullness, lower pole ptosis, and a well-defined inframammary fold (IMF) [2,3]. However, many surgeons fail to adequately address second stage procedures or the reconstruction process overall that can help achieve improved cosmesis [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aesthetic outcomes of the overall reconstruction were scored on a ten-point scale, with 10 representing the best possible aesthetic outcome. Aesthetic outcome of the inframammary fold was graded on a four-point scale based on established scoring categories [17]. The fold was rated excellent if it was well-defined and symmetrical (score of 4), good if it was well-defined and asymmetrical (score of 3), and fair or poor if it was ill-defined (score of 2 or 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%