2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0954579404044402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affect dysregulation in the mother–child relationship in the toddler years: Antecedents and consequences

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine child, maternal, and family antecedents of children's early affect dysregulation within the mother-child relationship and later cognitive and socioemotional correlates of affect dysregulation. Children's affect dysregulation at 24 and 36 months was defined in the context of mother-child interactions in semistructured play and toy cleanup. Dyads were classified as dysregulated at each age based on high negative affect. Affect dysregulation was associated with less matern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maternal education was included as a covariate; as expected based on previous work (e.g. Bernier et al, in press; Mills-Koonce et al, 2007; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 2004) it was associated with our observed measures of maternal positive affect (β= .19) and intrusiveness (β= −.13) here as well (see Figure 1). Moreover, because baseline EEG power is used in the calculation of EEG power change and may also be individually associated with attention behavior, baseline EEG power values at 5 and 10 months were entered into the model as control variables.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maternal education was included as a covariate; as expected based on previous work (e.g. Bernier et al, in press; Mills-Koonce et al, 2007; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 2004) it was associated with our observed measures of maternal positive affect (β= .19) and intrusiveness (β= −.13) here as well (see Figure 1). Moreover, because baseline EEG power is used in the calculation of EEG power change and may also be individually associated with attention behavior, baseline EEG power values at 5 and 10 months were entered into the model as control variables.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…As education level and income have both been associated with maternal sensitivity in a variety of other work (e.g. Bernier et al, in press; Mills-Koonce et al, 2007; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 2004) and were related to our measures of maternal positive affect and intrusiveness here, an important goal for future work will be to recruit mother-infant dyads with more variability in these measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An important goal for future work will be to recruit mothers with more variability in education level and/or income, as both of these have consistently been associated with maternal sensitivity in a variety of other work (e.g. Mills-Koonce, Propper, Gariepy, Blair, Garrett-Peters & Cox, 2007; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 2004). Finally, these data were not designed to address questions of maternal mental health or parenting style, but both of these factors are known to influence maternal sensitivity and parenting behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These coregulatory processes are elemental to sensitive, responsive parent – child relationships, which are salient forces in young children’s adaptation to adversity (e.g., Gewirtz, Forgatch, &Wieling, 2008; Wyman et al, 1999; Yates, Egeland, & Sroufe, 2003). Of particular import is affect regulation in the parent – child dyad, which is consistently found to mediate the association between rearing practices and child outcomes (e.g., NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 2004). Not surprisingly, parents’ emotion coaching predicts better emotion regulation – especially of anger – in children, which is in turn associated with lower levels of externalizing behaviors (Shortt, Stoolmiller, Smith-Shine, Eddy, & Sheeber, 2010).…”
Section: Dyadic Coregulationmentioning
confidence: 99%