As ample research ranging across academic disciplines has demonstrated, African readers have a long and multifarious history: from hieroglyphs in Egypt to early Ge'ez inscriptions in Ethiopia; from the founding of Al-Karaouine University in Fez in the ninth century to thirteenth-century Islamic manuscripts in Timbuktu and Ajami texts which transliterate African languages into Arabic script. 1 The material presence of the 'colonial library' is a very recent incursion alongside these reading traditions. 2 In most instances, European languages, Latin orthography and technologies of lead print production were introduced into certain regions of the continent only within the past 200 years. 3 With these physical manifestations of a colonial library came European imperialist attempts to impose languages, modes of thought and belief, especially in the domain of education and religion, and the appropriation and redeployment of these modes of print technology by local populations. The ensuing dialogue between North and South took the form of conflict, exploitation and the creation of strategic alliances. The cultivation of a local elite depended on teaching literacy in European languages, galvanising the nineteenth-century 'literacy myth'. 4 This 'myth' propped up 'the orthodoxy that reading and writing have a necessary interrelation to urbanization, industrialization and modernization', and asserted that 'participation in the modern social texture is primarily, and properly, conducted in and through writing and reading'. 5 In other words, across the varied contexts of colonial Africa, literacy in European languages both depended on and consistently imposed a strong association between reading, writing and power, with only limited strategic recourse to established and diverse indigenous and Islamic modes of reading. 6It is against this backdrop that early notions of 'development' emerged, spurred by teleological Enlightenment rhetoric and normative ideas of progress and modernity. As Joseph Slaughter explores in his study of the connections between human rights discourse and Bildungsromane, the association of literacy with modernity enabled the material and ideological cultivation of a mode of behaviour -a 'humanitarian interventionist posture of the literate, industrialized world toward the illiterate peoples of the Third World'. 7 In the nineteenth century, such postures justified the use of forced labour to build extensive communication and transport networks, and the creation of new borders, as well as the spread of European languages and formal education through Christian missionaries and public institutions. This imperial process has long been critiqued for failing to attend adequately to existing local contexts of knowledge production and circulation, indigenous governance systems and epistemologies. In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, as will be argued