Affect, technoscience and textual analysis: Interrogating the affective dynamics of the Zika epidemic through media texts

Abstract

Science and Technology Studies has become increasingly interested in the roles of affect and emotions in science and technology. Researchers have examined, for example, emotions in the production of scientific knowledge, patients' or users' affective experiences of technologies, and emotionally charged cultural representations of science. However, less attention has been paid to the underlying affective dynamics that connect these sites, experiences and representations. This article builds on the premises that, first, unpacking these underlying affective dynamics is pivotal to understanding emerging technoscientific phenomena, and, second, that such affective dynamics often need to be accessed through cultural texts such as media. This necessitates developing tools of textual analysis that can capture cultural emotions, affective intensities and the tensions and resonances that arise when affective intensities and culturally circulating emotions become entangled. To this end, the article develops methods of textual analysis through a case study: the affective dynamics underlying the Zika epidemic. Focusing on the New York Times coverage of the epidemic, the article identifies affective concentrations centering on temporality, invisibility, and the dissolution of material boundaries. It shows that there are considerable tensions both within and between these concentrations, and that such tensions engender affective intensities and emotional investments. By combining discursive and non-discursive dimensions of the affective dynamic of Zika, the analysis contributes to the growing STS methodological literature on affect and emotion in technoscience.

Managing unpleasant moods: Affective discipline in Facebook discussions

“…Binns, 2012;Cole, 2015;Dean, 2003;Loevlie et al, 2018;Nikunen, 2015;Paasonen, 2015;Rheingold, 1995;White and Crandall, 2017). Therefore, the concept of affect provides a fruitful analytical tool to examine online discussions not only on the level of deliberation, but essentially as a phenomenon which mobilizes and is structured by emotion, feeling and sensation (Nikunen, 2015;Oikkonen, 2017;Paasonen, 2015;Papacharissi, 2015). Moreover, following Paasonen (2015), I suggest that the online discussions are driven, directed and sustained by distinct affective dynamics.…”

London’s fatbergs and affective infrastructuring

“…On this score, my analysis has some similarities with other treatments that derived affects from various cultural artefacts. Particularly pertinent is the work of Oikkonen (2017 ; see also Linden, 2019 , for a more granular approach) who provides an excellent analysis of the affects associated with the Zika epidemic as enacted through the pages of the New York Times . She focuses ‘on circulating phrases, recurring ways of speaking and narrating, and structural ways of organizing and framing the epidemic’ (p. 686).…”

Why feminist technoscience and feminist phenomenology should engage with each other: on subjectification/subjectivity

“…Some feminist technoscience and STS literature engages with the co-emergence of technology, science and society, with an eye for how affects are articulated and enacted within specific practices, how an expressed affect can help to shape practice and how affective framings can help to shape, for example, public engagement with public health science (Oikkonen, 2017; Lindén, 2019). Some such work explicitly studies affectivity within material-discursive practices with a focus on subjectivities.…”