2018
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1444193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective commitmentwithinthe public sector: antecedents and performance outcomes between ownership types

Abstract: How to generate affective commitment and realize its performance potential is deemed critical to public management. But in the context of service outsourcing, does ownership type influence its antecedents and performance outcomes? Drawing on postal survey data for English leisure providers, we find training is an antecedent across public and private ownership types; performance appraisal is an antecedent for private ownership only; while performance-related pay carries an insignificant effect. Affective commit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organizational commitment has been widely studied and related to organizational performance and effectiveness [ 54 ], although studies on organizational commitment and its influence on the organization are contradictory if we consider the differences between employees working in public and private organizations [ 63 ]. Affective organizational commitment has been related to customer performance, that is, employee performance that meets the expectations of the citizen in public organizations [ 64 , 65 ]. In this way, insofar as employees are more committed, they will display more proactive behavior in order to improve the public services they provide to citizens [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organizational commitment has been widely studied and related to organizational performance and effectiveness [ 54 ], although studies on organizational commitment and its influence on the organization are contradictory if we consider the differences between employees working in public and private organizations [ 63 ]. Affective organizational commitment has been related to customer performance, that is, employee performance that meets the expectations of the citizen in public organizations [ 64 , 65 ]. In this way, insofar as employees are more committed, they will display more proactive behavior in order to improve the public services they provide to citizens [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the different calls to continue research into the public sector, it seems that studies of commitment are still being neglected by the scientific literature [ 64 ]. Therefore, we hypothesize that affective organizational commitment will have a significant and positive relationship with the service that employees provide to citizens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, although the need to study possible differences between ministries and agencies has been emphasized for a long time (Selin 2015), unfortunately, most comparative studies in public management literature still investigate ministries and agencies as one homogeneous public sector (for an exception, see Hodgkinson et al 2018). Albeit government-owned and under ministerial responsibility, agencies are organizationally distinct and, to a varying degree, independent from ministries (Selin 2015).…”
Section: Distinction Between Government Businesses and Semi-autonommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive work behavior earlier will have a further impact on their contribution to the organization. Therefore, affective commitment is considered to have a positive role in the achievements of organizations and individuals (Hodgkinson et al, 2018;Irefin and Mechanic, 2014). Organizations need to develop policies that can increase employees' affective commitments.…”
Section: Affective Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%