2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective conflict and identification of knowledge sources in MNE teams

Abstract: Article:Vahtera, P, Buckley, P orcid.org/0000-0002-0450-5589 and Aliyev, M orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-094X (2017) Affective conflict and identification of knowledge sources in MNE teams. International Business Review, 26 (5). ABSTRACTHow does affective conflict influence identification of knowledge sources in MNE teams? We apply social exchange theory and consider the effect of two types of affective interpersonal conflict:relational tension and self-interest on identification of knowledge sources in MNE teams. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(198 reference statements)
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, multinational enterprises (MNEs) are increasingly internationalizing their R&D functions and tapping into diverse knowledge spread across the global networks of emerging and developed markets (Ambos & Schlegelmilch, 2003;Awate et al, 2015;Subramaniam & Venkatraman, 2001). This research stream emphasizes the importance of international teams to organizations not only in terms of knowledge acquisitions, utilization and new product development (Frost & Zhou, 2005;Sarin & McDermott, 2003;Vahtera et al, 2017), but also for safeguarding the long-term survival of firms and their ability to develop new product development capability (Subramaniam & Venkatraman, 2001), thus improving new product performance (NPP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, multinational enterprises (MNEs) are increasingly internationalizing their R&D functions and tapping into diverse knowledge spread across the global networks of emerging and developed markets (Ambos & Schlegelmilch, 2003;Awate et al, 2015;Subramaniam & Venkatraman, 2001). This research stream emphasizes the importance of international teams to organizations not only in terms of knowledge acquisitions, utilization and new product development (Frost & Zhou, 2005;Sarin & McDermott, 2003;Vahtera et al, 2017), but also for safeguarding the long-term survival of firms and their ability to develop new product development capability (Subramaniam & Venkatraman, 2001), thus improving new product performance (NPP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, a principal tenet of many successful organizations is increasingly predicated on the ability to assemble, develop and utilize cross-functional teams spanning geographical context (Sarin & McDermott, 2003;Vahtera et al, 2017). By mobilizing and utilizing diverse teams, organizations become well-endowed to be able to develop creative solutions and make better decisions (Curşeu, Schruijer, & Boroş, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are different facets or textures of conflict. Conflict may be affective, which is a condition in which cluster members have interpersonal clashes branded by anger, frustration, and other adverse emotional states [8,9]. Substantive conflict is characterized by divergences among group members' ideas and opinions about the task being performed, such as disagreement regarding the school's curriculum and expected outcomes compared to resources available [10].…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflito é definido, neste artigo, como o desequilíbrio no relacionamento entre dois ou mais atores que buscam agir visando somente cumprir seus objetivos (VAALAND;HAKANSSON, 2003). Alguns autores (PANTELI;SOCKALINGAM, 2005;VAHTERA et al 2017) defendem que algum grau de conflito pode auxiliar na criação e no desenvolvimento de conhecimento, uma vez que os desequilíbrios e problemas entre os atores acabam gerando a necessidade de soluções. ParaGadde e Håkansson (1993) o conflito pode ser analisado sob duas perspectivas, a primeira disruptiva e dissociativa, e a segunda ambígua que tanto pode ser benéfica como prejudicial à estabilidade da rede.…”
unclassified