1974
DOI: 10.1037/h0036121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This frequency-affect relation has been confirmed in many subsequent studies (Gilliland & Moore, 1924;Heingartner & Hall, 1974;Johnson, Kim, & Risse, 1985;Krugman, 1943;Lieberman & Walters, 1968;Moore, 1914;Mull, 1957;Verveer, Barry, & Bousfield, 1933;Washburn, Child, & Abel, 1927;Wilson, 1979; but see Brickman, Redfield, Harrison, &Crandall, 1972, andHeyduk, 1975, for negative results) for a large variety of music. Mere exposure effects on affect judgments have been obtained with classical music (both tonal and atonal: see, e.g., Gilliland & Moore, 1924;Mull, 1957),jazz (see, Copyright 1998 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 884 e.g., Verveer et aI., 1933), Korean (Johnson et aI., 1985), and Pakistani (Heingartner & Hall, 1974) music, as well as random tone sequences (Wilson, 1979). It is worth noting that all these studies used very few excerpts (on average, 4.6, ranging from 1 to 9 stimuli).…”
Section: The Mere Exposure Effect For Musicmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This frequency-affect relation has been confirmed in many subsequent studies (Gilliland & Moore, 1924;Heingartner & Hall, 1974;Johnson, Kim, & Risse, 1985;Krugman, 1943;Lieberman & Walters, 1968;Moore, 1914;Mull, 1957;Verveer, Barry, & Bousfield, 1933;Washburn, Child, & Abel, 1927;Wilson, 1979; but see Brickman, Redfield, Harrison, &Crandall, 1972, andHeyduk, 1975, for negative results) for a large variety of music. Mere exposure effects on affect judgments have been obtained with classical music (both tonal and atonal: see, e.g., Gilliland & Moore, 1924;Mull, 1957),jazz (see, Copyright 1998 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 884 e.g., Verveer et aI., 1933), Korean (Johnson et aI., 1985), and Pakistani (Heingartner & Hall, 1974) music, as well as random tone sequences (Wilson, 1979). It is worth noting that all these studies used very few excerpts (on average, 4.6, ranging from 1 to 9 stimuli).…”
Section: The Mere Exposure Effect For Musicmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…That mere repeated presentation of a musical selection increases its liking is a well-known phenomenon (see Heingarter & Hall, 1974, for a critical review of earlier studies as well as convincing supporting evidence). This exposure effect on preference is best conceptualized as ah implicit memory effect (Greve & Bauer, 1990).…”
Section: Exposure Effects On Preferences For Musicmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Music preferences are also influenced by familiarity. Liking for unfamiliar pieces typically increases as a function of exposure (e.g., Heingartner & Hall, 1974;Meyer, 1903;Peretz, Gaudreau, & Bonnel, 1998b;Verveer, Barry, & Bousfield, 1933), as does liking for visual art (e.g., Cutting, 2003). More provocatively, mere exposure (Zajonc, 1980)*even when listeners have no explicit memory for previously encountered stimuli*also increases liking for music and music-like stimuli (Johnson, Kim, & Risse, 1985;Szpunar, Schellenberg, & Pliner, 2004;Thompson, Balkwill, & Vernescu, 2000;Wilson, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%