2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective context interferes with brain responses during cognitive processing in borderline personality disorder: fMRI evidence

Abstract: Emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with loss of cognitive control in the face of intense negative emotion. Negative emotional context may interfere with cognitive processing through the dysmodulation of brain regions involved in regulation of emotion, impulse control, executive function and memory. Structural and metabolic brain abnormalities have been reported in these regions in BPD. Using novel fMRI protocols, we investigated the neural basis of negative affective i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
51
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduced hippocampal engagement to negative imagery may be associated with increased emotional arousal. Such changes have been suggested to result in less specificity of encoding the contextual details of incoming stimuli, a deficit seen in the setting of several psychiatric disorders, including depression, post traumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder (45–47). While the subjects in this study were healthy, it is possible that the patterns which emerge from the microbial clustering represent vulnerability factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced hippocampal engagement to negative imagery may be associated with increased emotional arousal. Such changes have been suggested to result in less specificity of encoding the contextual details of incoming stimuli, a deficit seen in the setting of several psychiatric disorders, including depression, post traumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder (45–47). While the subjects in this study were healthy, it is possible that the patterns which emerge from the microbial clustering represent vulnerability factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative affect interferes with brain responses sub-serving attention and impulse control in participants with BPD compared to healthy controls (Soloff et al, 2015). In a recent study, attention-driven fMRI tasks (Go No-Go, X-CPT) were modified to evoke affective interference by replacing the standard cognitive tokens with negative, positive and neutral Ekman faces (Ekman and Friesen, 1976).…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, attention-driven fMRI tasks (Go No-Go, X-CPT) were modified to evoke affective interference by replacing the standard cognitive tokens with negative, positive and neutral Ekman faces (Ekman and Friesen, 1976). Directing attention to negative affective stimuli resulted in increased modulation of fMRI responses in BPD subjects compared to controls in fronto-limbic pathways, including the orbital frontal cortex (OFC) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), areas critically involved in control of emotion and impulsive behavior (Soloff et al, 2015). Negative affective interference during cognitive processing in these regulatory areas may contribute to emotion dysregulation, impulsive and aggressive behavior in patients with BPD (Siever, 2008).…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increased attentional process in the domain of selective attention when negative stimuli are involved and thus a deficit of inhibition of irrelevant information of aversive nature has been demonstrated in various studies (Domes et al, 2006; Soloff et al, 2015). The inability of borderline patients to disengage attention from negative stimuli may explain the good performance in the block where lack of inhibition of negative stimuli is advantageous (i.e., the target category NEGATIVE) and a worse performance where inhibition of negative stimuli is required (i.e., the block with target category POSITIVE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%