2018
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2018.1526412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective design using machine learning: a survey and its prospect of conjoining big data

Abstract: Customer satisfaction in purchasing new products is an important issue that needs to be addressed in today's competitive markets. Consumers not only need to be solely satisfied with the functional requirements of a product, and they are also concerned with the affective needs and aesthetic appreciation of the product. A product with good affective design excites consumer emotional feelings so as to buy the product. However, affective design often involves complex and multi-dimensional problems for modelling an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many challenges to be overcome in developing a new ML algorithm or adapting classic algorithms to the context of Big Data. There are several works that detail these challenges [15,21,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Challenges Of Machine Learning In Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many challenges to be overcome in developing a new ML algorithm or adapting classic algorithms to the context of Big Data. There are several works that detail these challenges [15,21,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Challenges Of Machine Learning In Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chan [38] presents a survey on ML approaches commonly used for affective design when using two data streams, traditional survey data and modern big data. The author provides a classification of ML technologies for traditional survey data.…”
Section: Challenges Of Machine Learning In Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gartner magic quadrant for data science and machine learning platforms indicate a graphical competitive positioning of four categories of distinguished technology vendors for data science. These categories or quadrants are: Challengers, Leaders, Niche Players and Visionaries 1 . As depicted in Figure 2 sixteen different technology providers have been divided into the designated four categories.…”
Section: Predictive Analytics Tools and Apismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently proliferated KGs span to embody domain dependent and independent facts. Examples of domain-independent (openworld) KGs include Freebase 8 , YAGO 9 , Dublin Core (DC 10 ), Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS 11 ), Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities (SIOC 12 ), and DBPedia 13 knowledge base, to cite a few. On the other hand, domaindependent KGs provide an overabundance of benefits to tackle domain-specific problems as well as to acquire the added value from domain corpora [55].…”
Section: Knowledge Graph -An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%