“…In numerous cases, either overtly or subtly, programs are still steeped in a cultural context of empire building and cultural superiority (Benham Rennick, 2012b;Caluya, Probyn, & Vyas, 2011;Chapman & Pyvis, 2006), and, even as global society becomes more open to diversity, national and foreign policies continue to reflect inherited cultural norms and values that are identifiable in institutional and program goals (Hervieu Léger, 2000;Irwin Zarecka, 1994). Research attending to issues of equitable relations, solidarity, social and pedagogical responsibilities for learning abroad has highlighted deficiencies in program planning and pedagogical frameworks (Caluya et al, 2011;Joseph, 2008Joseph, , 2012Joseph, Winzer, & Pollard, 2006;Larsson, Boud, Abrandt Dahlgren, Walters, & Sork, 2005;Miliszewska & Sztendur, 2012;Ryan, 2012;Welch, 2012aWelch, , 2012bXiaoping, 2010). For example, Ryan (2012) notes that, despite the growing internationalization agenda, West ern universities continue to rely on outdated and unquestioned assumptions about the superiority of West ern academic ways.…”