2018
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2018.1499792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective homogeneity in the Spanish general election debate. A comparative analysis of social networks political agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Swiss politicians show a very strongly polarized structure in online support networks [15]. Similarly, communication flows of Catalan parliamentarians are found to be polarized along party and ideological lines [5,26]. All these studies are single-country studies and do not provide insights in contextual variables influencing elite polarization and interaction, which might explain the differences in these findings.…”
Section: Parliamentary Twitter Network and Elite Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Swiss politicians show a very strongly polarized structure in online support networks [15]. Similarly, communication flows of Catalan parliamentarians are found to be polarized along party and ideological lines [5,26]. All these studies are single-country studies and do not provide insights in contextual variables influencing elite polarization and interaction, which might explain the differences in these findings.…”
Section: Parliamentary Twitter Network and Elite Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived similarity can be based on social and economic status, other background factors, or shared attitudes (Lazarsfeld & Merton, ; McPherson, Smith‐Lovin, & Cook, ). Social media, in particular, offers many possibilities for social networking on the basis of similarity (Kang & Chung, ; Oksanen, Hawdon, & Räsänen, ), and online social networks often form around attitudinal or affective homogeneity (see Robles, Velez, De Marco, Rodriguez, & Gomez, ; Zollo et al, ).…”
Section: The Identity Bubble Reinforcement Model (Ibrm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6]). Many fields of science, and particularly social sciences (see, e.g., [7]), are being removed by this new paradigm: wide aspects of reality can be systematically observed, and such overwhelming data set requires specific technologies to be visualized (see, e.g. [8]), to be processed (see, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%