2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective modulation of swallowing rates: Unpleasantness or arousal?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings resembles with results reported in many previous studies using Affective International Affective Picture System (IAPS) picture series in various experimental contexts. 12,13 Likewise, increase in heart rate in negative mood state was seen as compared to neutral and positive mood state. A similar study by Schwerdtfeger et al 14 revealed that depression lead to higher heart rate all over the day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These findings resembles with results reported in many previous studies using Affective International Affective Picture System (IAPS) picture series in various experimental contexts. 12,13 Likewise, increase in heart rate in negative mood state was seen as compared to neutral and positive mood state. A similar study by Schwerdtfeger et al 14 revealed that depression lead to higher heart rate all over the day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Failures to take into account this situatedness may lead to unsatisfactory or ambiguous operationalizations (Markman and Brendl, 2005; Seibt et al, 2008; Van Dantzig et al, 2008; Beatty et al, 2016). Indeed, depending on the situation, the very same muscular contraction can either be considered as approach or avoidance: for example bringing a cake closer or withdrawing one’s hand from a spider both involve arm flexion 4 , and deglutition involves the swallowing of appetitive food stimuli but could also be involved in stress reactions (Ritz and Thöns, 2006). Moreover, as any situation, the experimental setting offers specific action possibilities (i.e., affordances ) that may interfere with traces targeted by the operationalization of approach-avoidance orientation (Cesario et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For completeness it has to be reported that the FAA displayed a negative peak, and that the Traveler was swallowing during that moment 2 . Because swallowing rates have been shown to be modulated by affective states (Cuevas et al, 1995; Ritz and Thöns, 2006), this reaction might also point to the strong emotional impact of the emerging image that had to be “digested” here. Nevertheless, after the image of the Grandma appeared, a successive increase of positive FAA peaks appeared (Table 3) culminating in the verbal report of the Traveler that the Grandma told her “not to worry too much.”…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%