1983
DOI: 10.1080/00224498309551184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective reactions of women to their initial experience of coitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
25
1
11

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
25
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous studies [7][8][9][10][11], we did not find gender differences in affect following sexual intercourse. Our study may have been limited in its ability to detect gender differences owing to the relatively small number of male participants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike previous studies [7][8][9][10][11], we did not find gender differences in affect following sexual intercourse. Our study may have been limited in its ability to detect gender differences owing to the relatively small number of male participants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Affect following sexual intercourse is also a potentially modifiable risk factor in that STI preventive interventions can aim to reduce adolescents' exposure to coital experiences that may be associated with poorer affect. Female college students who felt most guilty after their first sexual intercourse were more likely to have had the experience at an earlier age, with a casual partner, and after drinking alcohol [43]; use of drugs and sex in public settings have also been associated with negative affect following first coitus in a similar population [7]. Additional research may identify similar sexual situations that may produce worse affect among youth with ongoing sexual activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Questions typically include how the transition to first sexual intercourse differs as a function of social and background variables. Antecedents include an array of demographic, community, familial, and attitudinal influences, including gender (Laumann et al, 1994;Weis, 1983), biological influences (Carver & Udry, 1997;Udry, 1988), race (Weinberg & Williams, 1990), and social class (Gecas & Seff, 1990;Lauritsen, 1994;Weinberg & Williams, 1980). Consistent with their focus on socialization and self-concept, structural symbolic interactionists examine in great detail sources of sexual socialization and variations in the ways that information is conveyed.…”
Section: Use Of Symbolic Interaction In Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%