2019
DOI: 10.1101/568840
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults

Abstract: 45Age-related hearing loss leads to poorer speech comprehension, particularly in noise. Speech-in-noise 46 (SIN) deficits among the elderly could result from weaker neural activity within, or poorer signal 47 transmission between brainstem and auditory cortices. By recording neuroelectric responses from 48 brainstem (BS) and primary auditory cortex (PAC), we show that beyond simply attenuating neural 49 activity, hearing loss in older adults compromises the transmission of speech information between 50 subcort… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
6
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2I). Critically, attention enhanced P2 (F1, 136 = 4.97, p = 0.03), confirming its role in active listening (Naatanen, 1975;Picton and Hillyard, 1974) and a biomarker of SIN perception (Bidelman et al, 2019). No other significant effects or interactions were found.3.3 Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity…”
Section: Cortical Erpsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2I). Critically, attention enhanced P2 (F1, 136 = 4.97, p = 0.03), confirming its role in active listening (Naatanen, 1975;Picton and Hillyard, 1974) and a biomarker of SIN perception (Bidelman et al, 2019). No other significant effects or interactions were found.3.3 Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity…”
Section: Cortical Erpsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Twenty young adults (age: 18-35 years, M = 24, SD = 3.4 years; 11 female) participated in the study. An a priori power analysis (t-test, 2-tailed,  = 0.05, power = 95%) revealed this sample was sufficient to detect similar sized effects (d = 0.84, 1.0) as in previous FFR/ERP SIN studies (Bidelman et al, 2019;GPower v3.1). All participants exhibited normal hearing thresholds ( 25 dB HL; 250-8000 Hz).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations