1985
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902310403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Neuron number and size following cochlea removal

Abstract: _Studies of the avian auditory sytem indicate that neurons in nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and nucleus laminaris of young animals are dramatically altered by changes in the auditory receptor. We examined the role of presynaptic activity on these transneuronal regulatory events. TTX was used to block action potentials in the auditory nerve. TTX injections into the perilymph reliably blocked all neuronal activity in the cochlear nerve and NM. Far-field recordings of sound-evoked potentials revealed that response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
194
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
14
194
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both manipulations cause an immediate cessation of action potentials of excitatory NM afferents to affected NL dendrites (Born et al, 1991) and both appear to produce similar changes in MAP2 immunoreactivity in NL dendrites, as shown in the current study. Cochlea removal does not directly damage the NM axons that innervate NL dendrites and deafferentation-induced cell death in NM does not occur for 2 days (Born and Rubel, 1985). Therefore, the changes in MAP2 immunoreactivity in NL dendrites are likely to be a result of the elimination of presynaptic action potentials rather than frank degenerative changes or the release of degeneration-related cytokines from the presynaptic endings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both manipulations cause an immediate cessation of action potentials of excitatory NM afferents to affected NL dendrites (Born et al, 1991) and both appear to produce similar changes in MAP2 immunoreactivity in NL dendrites, as shown in the current study. Cochlea removal does not directly damage the NM axons that innervate NL dendrites and deafferentation-induced cell death in NM does not occur for 2 days (Born and Rubel, 1985). Therefore, the changes in MAP2 immunoreactivity in NL dendrites are likely to be a result of the elimination of presynaptic action potentials rather than frank degenerative changes or the release of degeneration-related cytokines from the presynaptic endings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure described in Born and Rubel (1985) was used. Animals were anesthetized as described above.…”
Section: Unilateral Cochlea Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, mitral and tufted cells of the olfactory system die following unilateral naris occlusion (Frazier and Brunjes, 1988;Meisami and Safari, 1981), and in the visual system, the survival of tectal neurons depends on activity-dependent release of trophic factors from retinotectal axon terminals (Catsicas et al, 1992). In the auditory system, cell death can occur in the cochlear nucleus following deafness (Born and Rubel, 1985;Hashisaki and Rubel, 1989;Tierney et al, 1997). Although cell death following sensory deprivation has been widely studied in a variety of systems, little work has gone into efforts *Corresponding author.…”
Section: Apoptosis; Neuroprotection; Auditory Brainstemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a common approach has been to remove one cochlea, thereby removing all excitatory afferent input to NM. Previous studies have shown that deafferentation by cochlea removal results in the death of 20-30% of the neurons in the ipsilateral NM and the remaining neurons show a decrease in soma size (Born and Rubel, 1985;Edmonds et al, 1999;Hyde and Durham, 1994). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockade of afferent input increases death in vivo in central (Catsicas et al, 1992;Galli-Resta et al, 1993) and peripheral neurons (Wright, 1981;Furber et al, 1987;Meriney et al, 1987;Maderdrut et al, 1988). In the avian auditory system, removal of the cochlea causes rapid atrophic changes, culminating in a 25-30% loss of neurons in the target, nucleus magnocellularis (Born and Rubel, 1985;Steward and Rubel, 1985;Sie and Rubel, 1992); blockade of electrical activity results in rapid atrophic changes and loss of magnocellularis neurons comparable with those after complete cochlear ablation (Born and Rubel, 1988;Pasic and Rubel, 1989;Rubel et al, 1990;Sie and Rubel, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%