1976
DOI: 10.3758/bf03214024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affiliation and aggression in rats

Abstract: The relationship between affiliation and aggression was examined in two experiments. In the first study, each of 12 male albino rats was allowed to choose in a T-maze between tw:o alternatives. One alternative housed a more aggressive target male and the other housed a less aggressIve target male. The subjects preferred the less aggressive target animal. A second investigation allowed each of 36 male albino rats to choose between a target animal and an empty compartment. The results were that all the subjects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But the results by themselves do not guarantee that coordinated shuttling develops because rewards are dependent on cooperating--in other words, satisfying the cooperative D-~N contingency. Rats also have a spontaneous tendency to approach each other (e.g., Latan6, Cappell, and Joy 1970;Taylor 1976Taylor , 1977. This might suffice for generating coordinated shuttling even if pairs are not re- warded specifically for coordinating, but rewarded only for individual shuttles in each other's presence.…”
Section: Are Pairs Coordinating Because They Are Rewarded For Coordinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the results by themselves do not guarantee that coordinated shuttling develops because rewards are dependent on cooperating--in other words, satisfying the cooperative D-~N contingency. Rats also have a spontaneous tendency to approach each other (e.g., Latan6, Cappell, and Joy 1970;Taylor 1976Taylor , 1977. This might suffice for generating coordinated shuttling even if pairs are not re- warded specifically for coordinating, but rewarded only for individual shuttles in each other's presence.…”
Section: Are Pairs Coordinating Because They Are Rewarded For Coordinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submissive animals, given a choice to return to their home cage in a T-maze or to the home of the dominant animals, exhibited surprisingly many choices for the latter [94], while of course dominant animals would be expected to be eager for more social contact. Thus, aggressive situations still contain abundant positive social motivational features, which may help explain the modest levels of 50-kHz vocalizations evident in resident -intruder paradigms.…”
Section: Negatively Valenced Stimuli Reduce the Tickle Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model of cooperative behavior offers one way to study aggression within the social context of a stable behavioral relationship. The use of rats reflects the recognition that it is a social species capable of forming colonies organized on the basis of hierarchy [Adams and Boice, 1983;Barnett, 19751 and exhibiting affiliation in the laboratory [Latane et al, 1970;Taylor, 1976Taylor, , 1977Wills et al, 19831. The prediction was that cooperation would develop and stabilize when aggression did not impede mobility and proximity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%