2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4820441
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine extensions of non-crystallographic Coxeter groups induced by projection

Abstract: Reidun (2013) 'A ne extensions of non-crystallographic Coxeter groups induced by projection.', Journal of mathematical physics., 54 (9). 093508. Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not change… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Affine extensions are constructed in the Coxeter framework by adding affine reflection planes not containing the origin [42]. A detailed account of this construction is presented elsewhere [44,10,11], but essentially the affine extension amounts to making the reflection group G topologically non-compact by adding a translation operator T . The structures of viruses follow several different extensions of the (chiral) icosahedral group I by translation operators [28,12,29].…”
Section: Coxeter Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affine extensions are constructed in the Coxeter framework by adding affine reflection planes not containing the origin [42]. A detailed account of this construction is presented elsewhere [44,10,11], but essentially the affine extension amounts to making the reflection group G topologically non-compact by adding a translation operator T . The structures of viruses follow several different extensions of the (chiral) icosahedral group I by translation operators [28,12,29].…”
Section: Coxeter Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we demonstrate how in fact the rank-4 groups can be derived from the rank-3 groups via the geometric product of Clifford Geometric Algebra. This is complementary to the top-down approaches of projection, for instance from E 8 to H 4 [35,32,27,25,6], or of generating subgroups by deleting nodes in Coxeter-Dynkin diagrams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). This is also related to the fact that on the level of the root system there is a projection which maps the 240 roots of E 8 onto the 120 roots of H 4 and their τ -multiples in one of the H 4 -invariant 4-subspaces [5,21] (cf. previous section).…”
Section: H 4 As a Group Of Rotations Rather Than Reflections IImentioning
confidence: 99%