2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36334-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine Pairings on ARM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…cost in Fp single pairing 280m + 1436s + 2148mE + 135sE+ 10652m + 32968a + 4i +996rE + 1309m ξ + 15175ã + 288m + 4ĩ each extra pairing 238m + 266s + 938mE + 126sE + 497rE+ 4474m + 9954 210m ξ + 4767ã + 288m each extra 910mE + 420rE + 210m ξ + 3500ã + 280m 2100m + 7420a fixed point pairing Table 3. Costs of the multipairing computation Table 4 presents a comparison against the works [1] and [13]. In [1] a pairing library using affine coordinates was presented, whereas [13] reports an assembler optimized pairing library using standard projective coordinates.…”
Section: # Pairingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…cost in Fp single pairing 280m + 1436s + 2148mE + 135sE+ 10652m + 32968a + 4i +996rE + 1309m ξ + 15175ã + 288m + 4ĩ each extra pairing 238m + 266s + 938mE + 126sE + 497rE+ 4474m + 9954 210m ξ + 4767ã + 288m each extra 910mE + 420rE + 210m ξ + 3500ã + 280m 2100m + 7420a fixed point pairing Table 3. Costs of the multipairing computation Table 4 presents a comparison against the works [1] and [13]. In [1] a pairing library using affine coordinates was presented, whereas [13] reports an assembler optimized pairing library using standard projective coordinates.…”
Section: # Pairingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs of the multipairing computation Table 4 presents a comparison against the works [1] and [13]. In [1] a pairing library using affine coordinates was presented, whereas [13] reports an assembler optimized pairing library using standard projective coordinates. Notice that the authors in [13] did not consider the usage of NEON.…”
Section: # Pairingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most recently, Aranha et al [3] have computed the O-Ate pairing at the 128-bit security level in under 2 million cycles on various 64-bit PC processors. In contrast, relatively few articles [1,10] have considered efficient software implementations of pairings on ARM-based platforms such as handheld smartphones and tablets. These platforms are widely predicted to become a dominant computing platform in the near future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%