2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine Policies for Flexibility Provision by Natural Gas Networks to Power Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b. Moreover, optimizing the base stochastic policy with the exact reformulation of the double-sided chance constraints in (7) demonstrates a less conservative solution than the Chebyshev approximation (as in [4] and [6]), which guarantees the same constraint satisfaction probability but at larger expected cost of $698,643, which is 2.5% more expensive than in Table I.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2b. Moreover, optimizing the base stochastic policy with the exact reformulation of the double-sided chance constraints in (7) demonstrates a less conservative solution than the Chebyshev approximation (as in [4] and [6]), which guarantees the same constraint satisfaction probability but at larger expected cost of $698,643, which is 2.5% more expensive than in Table I.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linepack models in [3] and [4], however, provide flexibility in the interest of stochastic day-ahead scheduling. As two-stage stochastic programs, they co-optimize nominal Vladimir Dvorkin and Dharik Mallapragada acknowledge funding from the MIT Energy Initiative Low-Carbon Energy Center on Electric Power Systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to imperfect forecasts of the wind power output, deviation from the original forecast may occur in real-time. Taking into account the uncertainty from the forecast errors, we model the real-time response of controllable generation units via affine control policies [36]. The response of controllable generation units is expressed as follows…”
Section: Affine Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the IEHS systems, the approach was used in [34,35] to determine the optimal day-ahead unit commitment, and energy and reserve dispatch respectively. Refs [36,37] applied the approach in the integrated electricity and natural gas system for considering the uncertainty in the natural gas system network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%