2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4752735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine-response model of molecular solvation of ions: Accurate predictions of asymmetric charging free energies

Abstract: Two mechanisms have been proposed to drive asymmetric solvent response to a solute charge: a static potential contribution similar to the liquid-vapor potential, and a steric contribution associated with a water molecule's structure and charge distribution. In this work, we use free-energy perturbation molecular-dynamics calculations in explicit water to show that these mechanisms act in complementary regimes; the large static potential (∼44 kJ/mol/e) dominates asymmetric response for deeply buried charges, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
154
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential-of-mean-force (PMF) interpretation of continuum models provides the critical bridge allowing modelers to focus exclusively on the solvent response; extensive molecular dynamics simulations can then employ reasonably simple models of solutes in order to investigate deviations from expected continuum behavior [22]. Experiments are reality, of course, and simulations are only theory; to first order, however, today we are in a situation in which the major weaknesses in our continuum theories can be identified using higher-level theory (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The potential-of-mean-force (PMF) interpretation of continuum models provides the critical bridge allowing modelers to focus exclusively on the solvent response; extensive molecular dynamics simulations can then employ reasonably simple models of solutes in order to investigate deviations from expected continuum behavior [22]. Experiments are reality, of course, and simulations are only theory; to first order, however, today we are in a situation in which the major weaknesses in our continuum theories can be identified using higher-level theory (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics studies do indicate the presence of nonlinear saturation effects at the level of individual water molecules. However, our own experience with testing solvent models against MD simulations [22], suggests to us that for the purpose of computing biomolecule solvation free energies, nonlinear response is often less relevant than nonlocal response. Recently Pettitt et al have introduced a fast electrostatic model based on tabulated solvent charge densities around protein chemical groups, achieving exceptional accuracy, while nevertheless employing a superposition principle that essentially imposes linearity [136].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, understanding the charge hyrdation a) Electronic mail: t.duignan@uq.edu.au b) Electronic mail: marcel.baer@pnnl.gov c) Electronic mail: chris.mundy@pnnl.gov asymmetry (CHA) has been the subject of significant research. [8][9][10] The CHA describes the preference for water to solvate an anion over a cation of similar size. Because we do not know what the correct values for the single ion solvation free energies are, the CHA remains elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our recent study of ion solvation using molecular dynamics, we found that in an uncharged quasi-spherical solute representing a small molecule, the electrostatic potential due to solvent structure was on the order of 10 kcal/mol/ e 51 ; Ashbaugh has shown that this potential depends non-monotonically on the ion radius for small ions 52 , though the magnitude of variation is small compared to the overall magnitude. This “static potential” contributes linearly to the electrostatic solvation free energy, so that instead of the usual linear-response model in which normalΔGsolvfalse(qfalse)=12qTLq where L is the usual reaction-potential operator, we have instead an affine-response model normalΔGsolvfalse(qfalse)=12qTLq+ϕstatic,Tq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%