2006
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2006.0045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine Stanley symmetric functions

Abstract: Abstract. We define a new familyFw(X) of generating functions for w ∈Sn which are affine analogues of Stanley symmetric functions. We establish basic properties of these functions including symmetry, dominance and conjugation. We conjecture certain positivity properties in terms of a subfamily of symmetric functions called affine Schur functions. As applications, we show how affine Stanley symmetric functions generalise the (dual of the) k-Schur functions of Lapointe, Lascoux and Morse as well as the cylindric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
230
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
230
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main theorem (Theorem 7.1) identifies the Schubert classes σ w ∈ H * (Gr) and σ w ∈ H * (Gr) as explicit symmetric functions under this isomorphism. These symmetric functions are combinatorially defined: in homology the σ w ∈ H * (Gr) are represented by Lascoux-LapointeMorse's k-Schur functions s (k) w (x) ∈ Λ n and in cohomology the σ w ∈ H * (Gr) are represented by the dual k-Schur functions (or affine Schur functions)F w (x) ∈ Λ n ; see [21,24,17]. Our theorem was originally conjectured by Mark Shimozono (the conjecture was made explicit in the cohomology case by Jennifer Morse).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our main theorem (Theorem 7.1) identifies the Schubert classes σ w ∈ H * (Gr) and σ w ∈ H * (Gr) as explicit symmetric functions under this isomorphism. These symmetric functions are combinatorially defined: in homology the σ w ∈ H * (Gr) are represented by Lascoux-LapointeMorse's k-Schur functions s (k) w (x) ∈ Λ n and in cohomology the σ w ∈ H * (Gr) are represented by the dual k-Schur functions (or affine Schur functions)F w (x) ∈ Λ n ; see [21,24,17]. Our theorem was originally conjectured by Mark Shimozono (the conjecture was made explicit in the cohomology case by Jennifer Morse).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algebras are tied together by the study of elements s (k) w ∈ B, introduced in [17], called non-commutative k-Schur functions. We show that they have a trio of descriptions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For G = SL n (C), Lam [15] identified the Schubert basis of H * (Gr SLn(C) ) with symmetric functions, called k-Schur functions, of Lapointe, Lascoux and Morse [18]; these arose in the study of Macdonald polynomials. The Schubert basis of H * (Gr SLn(C) ) are the dual k-Schur functions [19] which are generalized by the affine Stanley symmetric functions [14]. In [16] Pieri rules were given for the multiplication of Bott's generators on the Schubert bases of Bott's realization of H * (Gr SLn(C) ) and H * (Gr SLn(C) ).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symmetric functions Q (n) w are type C analogues of the affine Stanley symmetric functions studied in [14]. Some examples for the type C affine Stanley symmetric functions are given in Appendix B.…”
Section: Theorem 12 the Series Q (N)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affine nilCoxeter algebra is closely connected with affine Schur functions, k-Schur functions, and the affine Stanley symmetric functions, which are related to reduced word decompositions in the affine symmetric group (see e.g. [14,15]). The nilCoxeter algebra U N has generators u i , 1 ≤ i ≤ N − 1, which satisfy the same relations as they do in U N .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%