1984
DOI: 10.1021/ja00325a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinities of crown ethers, glymes, and polyamines for alkali picrates in toluene. Application of polymer-supported linear polyethers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that DMC did not coordinate with LiTf salt in an ocean of PEO chains. This is consistent with literature reports. ,,,, Generally, a carbonate group forms looser bonding to Li + compared to an EO group. …”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results suggest that DMC did not coordinate with LiTf salt in an ocean of PEO chains. This is consistent with literature reports. ,,,, Generally, a carbonate group forms looser bonding to Li + compared to an EO group. …”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…While the literature does not contain values for cation binding by a nonfluorinated analogue of tetraether 4 under matching conditions, the binding constant of 2.74 × 10 4 M -1 for Li + binding to triethylene glycol dimethyl ether in 199:1 toluenetetrahydrofuran illustrates the much stronger affinity of nonfluorinated polyethers for alkali metal ions. 45 In the absence of further experimental data, it is unclear whether the one single hydrogen atom of tetraether 4 has any appreciable effect on the stability of its cation complexes. We will further investigate how different numbers of fluorine atoms affect the shape and population of molecular orbitals and cation binding of perfluorinated ethers using experimental and computational means.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vm and wim determined for the present system were 0.48 mL and 1.01 x 10~4 mol, respectively. We can thus use 4.75 for the following calculation in place of l/[M+(s)]<£ and finally obtain l/k'• 4.75(1 + 2-^)/ Wi...4iCMH (6) ;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%