2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-011-1478-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity and removal of radionuclides mixture from low-level liquid waste by synthetic ferrierites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 showed a fast biosorption process with three disparate phases. The higher rate of the first period advises that the biosorption was physical in nature and limited by the available sites on the biosorbent; easily accessible by the Co 2+ [10,11]. At the second period, the rate was slowed down because the Co 2+ ions met a higher resistance to penetrate deeper in the remaining intraparticulate active sites [12].…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 showed a fast biosorption process with three disparate phases. The higher rate of the first period advises that the biosorption was physical in nature and limited by the available sites on the biosorbent; easily accessible by the Co 2+ [10,11]. At the second period, the rate was slowed down because the Co 2+ ions met a higher resistance to penetrate deeper in the remaining intraparticulate active sites [12].…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 whereas in Table 2 literature data concerning the sorption capacity of several sorbents (for the same metals and under similar experimental conditions) are presented for comparison [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. Taking into consideration the literature data and the findings of this study one can conclude that the investigated MoO 3 can be used for sorption of Ba, Cs and Eu from aqueous solutions as well as is an excellent sorbent for removal of Pb and U.…”
Section: Sorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For each batch experiment 50 mg of the prepared MoO 3 were contacted with 10 mL of each solution in polycarbonate tubes and the mixture was agitated on a mechanical shaker for 24 h. The mixture was then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min to separate the sorbent from the supernatant and the equilibrium pH was measured. The residual concentration of the metal in the supernatant was finally determined by c-ray spectroscopy using a HPGe detector (CANBERRA, REGe detector, efficiency 20 %, energy resolution 2.1 keV for the 1332 keV 60 Co c-radiation) connected with a standard computerbased gamma-spectroscopy set-up (in the case of the Ba, Cs and Eu), atomic absorption spectrometry-AAS with a Perkin Elmer Spectrophotometer (model 300A) (in the case of Pb) and Arsenazo-III method with a Shimadzu UV160A Spectrophotometer (in the case of U) [30][31][32].…”
Section: Sorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally it has been found that graphene oxide 192 and activated carbon 193 are both very effective at adsorbing radionuclides, as are synthetic ferrierites. 194 The whole field of radionuclide adsorption 195 has been reviewed.…”
Section: Nuclear Wastementioning
confidence: 99%