2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity Maturation of Monoclonal Antibody 1E11 by Targeted Randomization in CDR3 Regions Optimizes Therapeutic Antibody Targeting of HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer

Abstract: Anti-HER2 murine monoclonal antibody 1E11 has strong and synergistic anti-tumor activity in HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer cells when used in combination with trastuzumab. We presently optimized this antibody for human therapeutics. First, the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the murine antibody were grafted onto human germline immunoglobulin variable genes. No difference in affinity and biological activity was observed between chimeric 1E11 (ch1E11) and humanized 1E11 (hz1E11). Next, affinity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus we may conclude that for this set of Abs, the CDR-Hs largely drive binding. However, without such experimental data, it is not obvious how important each CDR is to the binding profile; e.g., there are certainly cases where light chains are very important for strong binding ( Ko et al, 2015 ). Unfortunately, simply comparing overall CDR sequence similarity (‘all’ in Figure 5—figure supplement 3 ), as might be appropriate without any assumptions, yields a pattern that doesn’t reflect binning as well as that for individual CDR-Hs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we may conclude that for this set of Abs, the CDR-Hs largely drive binding. However, without such experimental data, it is not obvious how important each CDR is to the binding profile; e.g., there are certainly cases where light chains are very important for strong binding ( Ko et al, 2015 ). Unfortunately, simply comparing overall CDR sequence similarity (‘all’ in Figure 5—figure supplement 3 ), as might be appropriate without any assumptions, yields a pattern that doesn’t reflect binning as well as that for individual CDR-Hs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e affinity maturation technologies mimic the in vivo antibody maturation occurring in B cells during the immune response [9][10][11], but achieving higher affinities (from 10 − 10 to 10 − 15 mol/L) than those obtained in vivo (about 10 − 10 mol/ L) [12][13][14]. ese technologies are based on random mutation of the antibody binding sites [15][16][17][18][19][20] and the subsequent selection of the antibody variants showing the highest affinity for the target, using a variety of display methods (yeast surface display, phage display, E. coli surface display, mammalian cell display, ribosome display and mRNA display) [21][22][23]. Among them, yeast surface display (YSD) is the most widely used affinity maturation platform because it combines a lot of advantages compared with the other approaches [24][25][26][27]; in particular, the eukaryotic machinery ensures the correct folding and post-translational modifications of the displayed proteins; in addition, the in vivo yeast recombination is more efficient than in vitro cloning by ligation for the library generation [28]; more importantly, above all, clones with improved affinity can be selected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a). The targeted residues were randomized using hand-mixed spiked oligonucleotides, which were designed to randomly mutate each residue while retaining the parental amino acids at a level of ~50% at each residue 25,26 , to conserve parental residues critically contributing to IL-4Rα binding (Fig. 2a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affinity maturation of Abs by CDR mutagenesis was conducted in the scFab format containing a linker with 63 amino acids between the light chain and the heavy chain 27 . In the affinity maturation of 4R34, the targeted residues in VH-CDR3 (residues 95–98), VH-CDR2 (residues 50, 52–57), and VL-CDR3 (residues 89, 90, 93, 95a) were randomized using hand-mixed spiked oligonucleotides 25,26 , as described in the text. In the affinity maturation of 4R34.1, the targeted residues of VL-CDR1 (residues 27–32) and VH-CDR1 (residues 31–35) were randomized with a degenerate codon NNK 26 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%