2013
DOI: 10.5089/9781484320587.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afghanistan: Balancing Social and Security Spending in the Context of Shrinking Resource Envelope

Abstract: For Afghanistan, the dual prospect of declining donor support and high ongoing security spending over the medium term keeps its government budget tight. This paper uses a general equilibrium model to capture the security-development trade-off facing the government in its effort to rehabilitate growth and fiscal sustainability. In particular, it considers strategic policy options for counteracting and minimizing the negative macroeconomic impact of possible aid and revenue shortfalls. We find that the mobilizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending DIG-Labor 1-3 is consistent with the broad agenda of tailoring models to country speci-…cities and needs. Over the years, the DIG model has been extended to incorporate other dimensions, such as an energy sector (Issoufou et al, 2014), the cost of operations and maintenance of infrastructure (Adam and Bevan, 2014), climate resilient infrastructure to address natural disaster shocks (Marto et al, 2018), and security spending (Aslam et al, 2014), among others. Special mention must be made of the extension by Atolia et al (2019), who explore the trade-o¤s between investing in economic infrastructure vs. investing in social infrastructure (schools).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending DIG-Labor 1-3 is consistent with the broad agenda of tailoring models to country speci-…cities and needs. Over the years, the DIG model has been extended to incorporate other dimensions, such as an energy sector (Issoufou et al, 2014), the cost of operations and maintenance of infrastructure (Adam and Bevan, 2014), climate resilient infrastructure to address natural disaster shocks (Marto et al, 2018), and security spending (Aslam et al, 2014), among others. Special mention must be made of the extension by Atolia et al (2019), who explore the trade-o¤s between investing in economic infrastructure vs. investing in social infrastructure (schools).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further extensions were geared to the analysis of costs of operations and maintenance (Adam and Bevan, 2014); building climate resilient infrastructure ; the trade-offs between investing on economic and social infrastructure (Atolia et. al., 2017); and the trade-offs between public investment and security spending (Aslam et. al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%