Afghanistan's 2006 and 2011 Fund-supported programs were part of a broad reconstruction effort aimed at establishing macroeconomic stability and laying foundations for structural reforms. Decades of conflict eroded societal order and trust in government, and limited public institutions' implementation capacity. Both arrangements faced the challenges of dealing with unprecedented inflows of international aid and scaling up of public investment against the background of increasing nonsecurity. There were notable successes during the two programs, even though both fell short of their initial goals. On the one hand, supported by aid inflows, the economy grew fast, inflation declined, and international reserves increased. Afghanistan successfully completed the debt relief process under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative. Selected structural reforms also advanced, particularly during the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility arrangement, especially in the area of public financial management. Afghanistan made impressive strides toward meeting the Millennium Development Goals. On the other hand, fiscal sustainability remained elusive as the tax-to-GDP ratio declined and expenditures increased sharply owing to rising security and maintenance costs. Fiscal reforms, such as the VAT, remained incomplete. Despite progress in financial system oversight and governance, some financial sector reforms are still pending. The legislative framework and its enforcement remain to be completed. Aid had both positive and negative effects. The large annual inflows, estimated at around ½ of GDP, played a critical role in stabilizing Afghanistan. Volatility and unpredictability of aid complicated macroeconomic forecasting and policymaking, however. Significant off-budget spending by donors contributed to the buildup of a better-paid "parallel" civil service, which demotivated the regular civil service and weakened program ownership. Potential gains from a new Fund arrangement need to be assessed in the context of rising civil insecurity and political instability. The Fund experience of working in conflict situations is mixed, as reforms struggle to gain traction and to catalyze private sector-led growth. With long-term aid inflows set to decline to a lower level, Fund engagement can at best help manage the transition while maintaining macroeconomic stability. Retaining