2015
DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2015.1058617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afghanistan's India–Pakistan dilemma: advocacy coalitions in weak states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…India’s strategy involved a focus on development, economic stability and provision of basic needs in support of the more moderate political regimes in power, though D’Souza also comments that India’s capacity-building projects ended up being capacity substituting as infrastructure projects lacked long-term sustainability (Souza, 2021). This was also intended to erode the base for the Taliban, though as Paliwal (2016, p. 477) observes, ‘New Delhi was closely watching Taliban movements and searching for ways to build political constituencies in the Pashtun hinterlands along the border with Pakistan’. Paliwal (2015, p. 32), also informs us that India covertly engaged with certain Taliban and pro-Pakistan factions including Hekmatyar, the Quetta and Peshawar Shura between 2005 and 2006, though in the end, it had no network on the ground.…”
Section: Four Phases Of Interaction Between India and Talibanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…India’s strategy involved a focus on development, economic stability and provision of basic needs in support of the more moderate political regimes in power, though D’Souza also comments that India’s capacity-building projects ended up being capacity substituting as infrastructure projects lacked long-term sustainability (Souza, 2021). This was also intended to erode the base for the Taliban, though as Paliwal (2016, p. 477) observes, ‘New Delhi was closely watching Taliban movements and searching for ways to build political constituencies in the Pashtun hinterlands along the border with Pakistan’. Paliwal (2015, p. 32), also informs us that India covertly engaged with certain Taliban and pro-Pakistan factions including Hekmatyar, the Quetta and Peshawar Shura between 2005 and 2006, though in the end, it had no network on the ground.…”
Section: Four Phases Of Interaction Between India and Talibanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much has been written on the Pakistan-Taliban nexus, this nexus is not that simple. Paliwal (2016) examining the foreign policy behaviour of weak states in a turbulent geopolitical environment, argues that we can best understand Afghanistan’s policy as being Pakistan friendly or Pakistan averse and that despite the weakness of the state, its elites including the Afghan Taliban, understand the importance of balancing India and Pakistan. He notes that the shifting ethnic and religious alliances between groups in Afghanistan and these states show that there is no necessary alignment and reflect its independent agency.…”
Section: Four Phases Of Interaction Between India and Talibanmentioning
confidence: 99%