Aflatoxins - Detection, Measurement and Control 2011
DOI: 10.5772/24890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aflatoxin Measurement and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…if it is intended to detect and quantify the analyte, quantitative methods must be used. Usually, the analytical procedures follow the following steps: sampling, sample preparation (which can include extraction and clean-up (purification)), and analysis (identification and quantification) [5,12,13]. Even though it is less toxic than AFB1, AFM1 has hepatotoxic and carcinogenic effects, and is relatively stable during milk pasteurization, storage, and processing [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…if it is intended to detect and quantify the analyte, quantitative methods must be used. Usually, the analytical procedures follow the following steps: sampling, sample preparation (which can include extraction and clean-up (purification)), and analysis (identification and quantification) [5,12,13]. Even though it is less toxic than AFB1, AFM1 has hepatotoxic and carcinogenic effects, and is relatively stable during milk pasteurization, storage, and processing [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the analytical procedures follow the following steps: sampling, sample preparation (which can include extraction and clean-up (purification)), and analysis (identification and quantification) [5,12,13]. Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further to this, the adoption of an extraction method strongly depends on the analytical objectives; hence, for AF analysis, methods are required to meet established benchmark standards of the survey, monitory work, legislation and research [89]. It is in line with this that we propose the adoption of SWE as an alternative to conventional extraction methods for AFs, particularly with respect to improved recovery and selectivity, reduced organic solvent consumption and extraction time, at a lower cost.…”
Section: Other Methods For Aflatoxin Extractionmentioning
confidence: 95%