1999
DOI: 10.2307/20049597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Africa Works: Disorder as Political Instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, an in-depth understanding of forestland governance has two fundamental dimensions: the role of formal and informal strategies employed by some actors to force or resist domination (politics) on the one hand, and the strengths and weaknesses of various arrangements between government entities, business groups and other actors including civil society organisations (policies) concerning the governance of forest-related resources, on the other. A thorough investigation of these fundamental dimensions is particularly relevant in postcolonial and neo-colonial societies like those in Africa which have experienced strong social oppression (Mbembe 2001), manipulation of political (dis)order (Chabal and Daloz 1999) and contestation over the legitimacy of statehood (Hagman and Péclard 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an in-depth understanding of forestland governance has two fundamental dimensions: the role of formal and informal strategies employed by some actors to force or resist domination (politics) on the one hand, and the strengths and weaknesses of various arrangements between government entities, business groups and other actors including civil society organisations (policies) concerning the governance of forest-related resources, on the other. A thorough investigation of these fundamental dimensions is particularly relevant in postcolonial and neo-colonial societies like those in Africa which have experienced strong social oppression (Mbembe 2001), manipulation of political (dis)order (Chabal and Daloz 1999) and contestation over the legitimacy of statehood (Hagman and Péclard 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further -as detailed in a large political science literature on democracy in developing country contexts (e.g., Chabal and Daloz 1999), and recently highlighted by Acemoglu et al (2013) and Albertus and Menaldo (2014) a de jure democracy may be congruent with de facto concentration of power in the elites' hands, leading to "captured democracy" with little redistribution.…”
Section: Democracy Affects Income Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Existing scholarship delineates various drivers of public‐facing corruption, including material need (Alexandre, 2018; Becker & Stigler, 1974), deeply entrenched norms of social interaction (Bayart et al, 1999; Blundo & Sardan, 2006; Chabal & Daloz, 1999; Rose‐Ackerman, 1999; de Sardan, 2008), organizational culture (Baaz & Olsson, 2011; Sanchez de la Sierra, 2017; Verma, 1999); and personal greed (Bauhr, 2017; Hasty, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%