2000
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2000.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

African-Arabian and Asian-Pacific "Mocis frugalis": Two distinct species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Abstract: Abstract. It is shown that under the name Mocis frugalis (F., 1775), considered to represent a widespread pest of graminaceous crops in the Eastern hemisphere and the Pacific, two species have been hitherto confused. Populations from Africa and Arabian Pen insula are described as Mocis proverai sp. n. The main characters which distinguish the African-Arabian M. proverai from M. fru galis of Asia and the Pacific are found in the genitalia, especially the configuration of the male vesica and female bursa copulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to increased knowledge and advanced preparation methods, particularly for artificial male vesica eversion, systematic papers based partly or predominantly on vesica characteristics are published frequently (e.g. Lafontaine et al ., 1987; Andersen, 1988; Bolte, 1990; Staddon & Ahmad, 1995; Zilli, 2000; Simonsen, 2005). Surprisingly often, species splitting is based not on quantitative analyses on morphology, but only on subjective visual comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to increased knowledge and advanced preparation methods, particularly for artificial male vesica eversion, systematic papers based partly or predominantly on vesica characteristics are published frequently (e.g. Lafontaine et al ., 1987; Andersen, 1988; Bolte, 1990; Staddon & Ahmad, 1995; Zilli, 2000; Simonsen, 2005). Surprisingly often, species splitting is based not on quantitative analyses on morphology, but only on subjective visual comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%