Feminist concerns about the epistemological problems of quantitative methods have resulted in an underdevelopment of quantitative approaches that could contribute to existing intersectional theory. Further, feminist scholars commonly consider the effects of gender as it intersects with race or class, but relatively little of this research has included nativity (being either an immigrant or native-born to a society). This article addresses these shortcomings by examining patterns of earnings inequality at the intersection of gender, race, and nativity, comparing cohorts of African-born Black and white immigrants to their US-born counterparts over multiple time-points. Further, the depressive effects of gender are large enough so that while there are differences in women's earnings across race and nativity, nearly all groups of men still earn more than nearly all groups of women. The article's results demonstrate that privilege has a magnifying effect, with the advantages conferred from one privileged status increasing the effects of other privilege statuses, which become larger over time. These findings contribute to how feminists understand privileges and oppressions emerging from the intersections of gender with other social statuses, and how such intersections shape economic inequality.
Keywords: African migrants / earnings gap / economic inequality / feminist research methods / gender inequality / intersectionalityIn this article, we argue for the utility of quantitative analysis for understanding the intersecting effects of gender, race, and immigration status, or nativity (that is, whether someone is native born or foreign born), on earnings. Most 86 · Feminist Formations 26.2 intersectional analyses utilize qualitative methodologies, but we propose that it is also useful to use quantitative methods to understand intersecting relationships. In doing so, we argue that scholars can better compare differently oppressed or privileged groups by identifying macro-level patterns of inequality among groups. Specifically, our research shows that one privileged status magnifies the positive economic outcomes of other privilege statuses. Thus, greater differences in earnings can be seen in the intersecting status of privileged groups compared to oppressed groups. Because of this, intersecting statuses produce greater differences in earnings among different groups of men than among groups of women.This study fills some important gaps in the literature on gender and intersectionality. First, little research exists on the intersecting effects of gender, race, and nativity, so we know relatively little about how these statuses work in tandem with one another to shape economic opportunities for migrant women and men. Second, gender is often treated as a control variable in studies of immigrant earnings, without adequate explanation of how gender organizes labormarket outcomes (Curran, Shafer, Donato, and Garip 2006;Hondagneu-Sotelo 2003; Hondagneu-Sotelo and Cranford 2006;Nawyn 2010; Nawyn, Reosti, and Gjokaj 2009). Finall...