African organisational coaching practice: Exploring approaches used, and the factors influencing coaches’ fees

Abstract

Purpose: More context-specific research regarding the praxis of organisational coaching was needed for increased understanding of this emerging profession. Whilst progress was being made internationally, African coaching practice research was sparse, leading to potentially false assumptions about local praxis based on international trends. The aim of this research was to gain a context-specific perspective on the coaching approaches used by organisational coaches in Africa and the factors that influence the rates they charge.Design/methodology/approach: Snowball sampling was used to collect survey data from organisational coaches practicing in Africa (n = 299). Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.Findings/results: Organisational coaches in Africa predominantly use the Behavioural or Goal-focussed or GROW approach, but employ more sophisticated approaches in more complex situations. They charge a mean rate of R1761 ($1041) per hour (R1573 [$93] in South Africa) with higher qualified, more experienced and older coaches charging a higher rate. Receiving supervision plays no role in rates charged; however, belonging to a coaching body correlates to higher rates. Male and female coaches charge similar rates, suggesting a level of gender equality in the African coaching profession.Practical implications: Organisational coaches should ensure they have a wide repertoire of approaches to cater for the complexity of organisational situations. Coaches could increase their rates by obtaining high quality coaching education and join coaching regulatory bodies. Coaches in Africa could expand their market internationally given that they charge significantly lower rates, especially given the acceptance of virtual coaching in recent times.Originality/value: This is the first study to our knowledge that investigates pan-African coaching praxis.

Comparing artificial intelligence and human coaching goal attainment efficacy

“…However, not everyone has access to a coach, especially in less affluent societies. In Africa, for example, the average cost of an organisational coach is approximately 100 USD per session, which puts it out of reach of many [ 52 ]. The problem is not only cost.…”

Coaching during a crisis: Organizational coaches' praxis adaptation during the initial stages of the Covid‐19 pandemic

“…Although the term praxis can become clouded by philosophical positions on the importance of theory, practically this paper concurs with Penney and Warelow ( 1999 , p. 259) that in coaching “praxis can (and should) become a practical process that can be applied to one's own practice with the intent of changing, reshaping and discovering new meanings or drawing out the meanings which were always there.” The eclectic origins of coaching naturally leads coaches to consciously and sub‐ consciously adapting their praxis based on what the situation and client requires. Terblanche et al ( 2021 ), for example, found that coaches use simplistic coaching practices (goal‐focused) for less complex coaching topics (career progression), but employed advanced coaching practices (cognitive behavioral) for more complex topics (diversity issues). A recent coaching praxis survey also found that most coaches adapt their praxis based on the situational requirements (Sherpa Coaching, 2020 ).…”

“…The eclectic origins of coaching naturally leads coaches to consciously and sub-consciously adapting their praxis based on what the situation and client requires. Terblanche et al (2021), for example, found that coaches use simplistic coaching practices (goal-focused) for less complex coaching topics (career progression), but employed advanced coaching practices (cognitive behavioral) for more complex topics (diversity issues). A recent coaching praxis survey also found that most coaches adapt their praxis based on the situational requirements (Sherpa Coaching, 2020).…”