African Union Counterterrorism Frameworks and Implementation Trends among Member States of the East African Community

Abstract

Attacks from violent extremist organisations have reached unprecedented levels in Africa. Boko Haram, al-Shabaab, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and Islamic State and Sinai Peninsula activities account for the majority of high attacks and fatality rates. Their membership cuts across national borders; some have established a presence in local communities, while others are controlling territories in a number of states. This continues to happen despite regional measures such as the Algiers Plan of Action on the Prevention and Combating of Terrorism (2002) and the African Model Anti-Terrorism Law (2011) to contain the activities of violent extremist groups on the continent. The prevailing argument shows that the African Union has initiated several legislations and protocols to contain terrorism on the continent, but the Union lacks the capacity to enforce legislations. Relying on the cost–benefit theoretical explication, we conclude that member states of the East African Community prefer to partner with external organisations in counterterrorism programmes which result in conflicting cross-border rules and challenges in countering violent extremism in Africa.

Natural Resources, Conflict and Security Challenges in Africa

“…Contrarily, poor management of resources has had detrimental effects on Africa and African people. Scholars of the resource curse argument are of the view that poverty, underdevelopment, social violence, state fragility, weak governance and regime illegitimacy have been intensified and sustained by the mismanagement of the abundant-resource ownership (Omenma & Onyango, 2020).…”