After 10 Years: A Vision Forward for Progress in Community Health Partnerships

Grieb, Suzanne M.; Pichon, Latrice C.; Kwon, Simona C.; Yeary, Karen; Tandon, Darius

doi:10.1353/cpr.2017.0002

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 46 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of course, this approach compounds the lengthy timelines associated with establishing trusting and inclusive CBPR collaborations, which is often at odds with academic tenure clocks and other institutional expectations (Springer & Skolarus, 2019). This reinforces previous observations that promotion of effective CBPR would be well-served by changes in academic structures and processes to recognize and value the extensive work that goes into collaboration (Grieb et al, 2017).…”

Section: Call-out Box 1 Common Lessons Across Strategiessupporting

confidence: 71%

Melding Multiple Sources of Knowledge: Using Theory and Experiential Knowledge to Design a Community Health Intervention Study

Silberberg

Muhlbaier

Hart-Brothers³

et al. 2021

Journal of Participatory Research Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is grounded in socioecological theories of health, using and addressing theory in CBPR can be challenging. This paper explores how theory was used and melded with community expertise in one CBPR study in Durham, North Carolina. Challenges to use of theory included time restrictions, the need to focus on meeting local needs and making short-term measurable gains, and differences among collaborators in comfort with and concern for theoretical discussion. Both community and theoretical voices were sometimes short-changed – particularly voices that were more difficult to access or integrate into existing ways of operating. Nonetheless, we were able to bring theory into our work at a number of stages and to meld theory with community expertise in ways that benefited our project. Our case study suggests the importance of creating opportunities for small group discussion; utilizing an iterative dialogic approach to melding theory and community expertise; grounding theoretical discussions in specific, concrete questions; taking the long view of CBPR, including purposefully bringing attention to theory even while responding to pragmatic concerns; and spending more time on building the capacity to collaborate of both academic and community partners. It also raises the need for funders to consider how to align their expectations of grantees with effective attention to root causes of poor health and health disparities.

show abstract

Section: Call-out Box 1 Common Lessons Across Strategiessupporting

confidence: 71%

Melding Multiple Sources of Knowledge: Using Theory and Experiential Knowledge to Design a Community Health Intervention Study

Silberberg

Muhlbaier

Hart-Brothers³

et al. 2021

Journal of Participatory Research Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Participants, or experts, contribute to a series of intensive questionnaires and structured group feedback sessions over several rounds; input is ‘pooled’ to generate reliable, group‐derived decisions or agreed‐upon consensus positions (Benson et al, 2020; Coleman et al, 2013; Hasson et al, 2000; Rideout et al, 2013). CSAAH has successfully applied this consensus and appraisal method before with community partners and stakeholders, and has found it to be effective for exploring priorities for public health, across diverse health topic areas and in gaining group agreement with community leaders and multi‐sectoral stakeholders (Figure 2) (Grieb et al, 2017; Rideout et al, 2013).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CSAAH has successfully applied this consensus and appraisal method before with community partners and stakeholders, and has found it to be effective for exploring priorities for public health, across diverse health topic areas and in gaining group agreement with community leaders and multi-sectoral stakeholders (Figure 2) (Grieb et al, 2017;Rideout et al, 2013).…”

Section: Modified Delphi Technique With Community and Research Stakeh...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring community knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease‐Related Dementias and healthy ageing in Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders

Wong

Min

Kranick

et al. 2022

Health Social Care Comm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) disparities exist in the rapidly growing and extremely heterogeneous Asian American and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NH/PI) ageing populations in the United States. Limited community‐clinical resources supporting culturally competent and timely diagnosis exacerbate barriers to existing care services in these populations. Community‐based participatory research or community‐engaged research are proven community‐academic research approaches that can support the development and implementation of community‐focused programmes to maximise community benefit. The NYU Center for the Study of Asian American Health engaged our national and local community partners to gain a deeper understanding of AD/ADRD in this diverse and growing population, to develop a strategic community‐engaged research agenda to understand, address and reduce AD/ADRD disparities among Asian American and NH/PI communities. Findings from an initial scoping review identified significant research gaps. We conducted a series of key informant interviews (n = 11) and a modified Delphi survey (n = 14) with Asian American and NH/PI community leaders and older adult service providers followed by a facilitated group discussion of survey findings to gain consensus on key priority research areas identified in the literature and to determine culturally and contextually appropriate approaches to support AD/ADRD prevention, early identification and treatment in Asian American and NH/PI communities. Future research and health education should focus on raising Asian American and NH/PI basic individual‐ and community‐level awareness about AD/ADRD and leveraging existing community assets to integrate effective engagement strategies to access AD/ADRD services within the healthcare system.

show abstract

“…The goal of our event was to introduce an academic-community partnership to key stakeholders to incorporate their diverse skills and interests into the research process as a way to foster the success of community-based interventions. 15 We used this health event as our first step in the process of building the collaboration with the community, and believe our efforts were successful. In addition, we used this health fair as a snapshot community health assessment 31 and a starting point for our future efforts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…14 Moreover, these partnerships are an effective way to promote health in underserved communities. 15 The principles of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) are often used to engage marginalized or vulnerable communities in the research process. 10,16 CBPR is an approach to research that combines the strengths of the research team and the community in a collaborative effort to implement a project.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engaging Latinos in an Academic-Community Partnership in Montana through a Health Screening Event

Moyce

Sisson

Thompson

et al. 2021

American Journal of Health Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Engaging minorities in research especially in Montana where Latinos make up a small percentage of the population can be a challenge. We describe an effort to recruit Latinos into a research study by hosting a health screening event.Purpose: This event served as the first step in the creation of an academic-community partnership. Methods: We formed an interdisciplinary research team and involved key community stakeholders in planning a health screening event. We provided lunch, flu vaccinations, and screening measures including blood pressure, body mass index, and diabetes status. We also asked for volunteers to sign up to participate in future focus groups. Results: Thirty five people participated in the health screening event, and 29 people volunteered to engage in future research. The majority of participants reported not having health insurance or a regular medical provider, were overweight or obese, and did not have diabetes. Discussion: Engaging the Latino community in research is important, and this paper describes the first step in the creation of an academic-community partnership. Translation to Health Education Practice: Attention to community needs through active partnership and adherence to the responsibilities and competencies for health education specialists provides an example of a successful study that can be adapted to other populations.

show abstract

After 10 Years: A Vision Forward for Progress in Community Health Partnerships

Cited by 6 publications

References 46 publications

Melding Multiple Sources of Knowledge: Using Theory and Experiential Knowledge to Design a Community Health Intervention Study

Melding Multiple Sources of Knowledge: Using Theory and Experiential Knowledge to Design a Community Health Intervention Study

Exploring community knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease‐Related Dementias and healthy ageing in Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders

Engaging Latinos in an Academic-Community Partnership in Montana through a Health Screening Event

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About