2014
DOI: 10.1177/1368431013516056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After Lévinas

Abstract: The centrality of Lévinasian ethics to Zygmunt Bauman's sociological vision has been affirmed by a number of writers. However, the way in which Bauman attempts to think through the implications of this ethical framework for political decision-making on a global scale has been seen as highly problematic. In recent years, Bauman has arguably begun to veer towards what can be seen as a more 'legislative' position, prioritizing what Lévinas calls archic issues relating to government, foundation and sovereignty, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our models, both the sociologist Bauman and the anthropologist Fassin are categorized as postmodern scholars or thinkers. Bauman deployed the Levinasian other that summons society into responsibility to the victims of consumerism and globalization (Hirst, 2014). Fassin employs the Foucauldian critique of governmentality of the bureaucracies that victimizes the vulnerable people (Holbraad, 2017).…”
Section: Social Science Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our models, both the sociologist Bauman and the anthropologist Fassin are categorized as postmodern scholars or thinkers. Bauman deployed the Levinasian other that summons society into responsibility to the victims of consumerism and globalization (Hirst, 2014). Fassin employs the Foucauldian critique of governmentality of the bureaucracies that victimizes the vulnerable people (Holbraad, 2017).…”
Section: Social Science Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%