2018
DOI: 10.1093/ia/iix234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After liberal world order

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The liberal school, on the other hand, has tended to focus on what the rise of an authoritarian state such as China would mean for the existing international order of free trade, human rights and democracy, as well as for the institutions that promote these liberal values (Ikenberry 2011(Ikenberry , 2016. Thus, many such debates are about the durability of the post-World War II liberal international order established by the United States, hypothesising what a China-centred world that replaced it would look like (Callahan 2008;Duncombe and Dunne 2018;Ikenberry 2018;Layne 2018). Here, most of the attention is on the nature of the political system in China, and the meaning of such an authoritarian state's rise for the rest of the world.…”
Section: Different Views On the Rise Of China?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liberal school, on the other hand, has tended to focus on what the rise of an authoritarian state such as China would mean for the existing international order of free trade, human rights and democracy, as well as for the institutions that promote these liberal values (Ikenberry 2011(Ikenberry , 2016. Thus, many such debates are about the durability of the post-World War II liberal international order established by the United States, hypothesising what a China-centred world that replaced it would look like (Callahan 2008;Duncombe and Dunne 2018;Ikenberry 2018;Layne 2018). Here, most of the attention is on the nature of the political system in China, and the meaning of such an authoritarian state's rise for the rest of the world.…”
Section: Different Views On the Rise Of China?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are diverse interpretations of the forces and causes of disruption to the global order, the hegemony of the liberal world order is deemed to be over [Duncombe, Dunne 2018]. Many in academia, official and policy circles, and media agree with how Richard Haass explains the current state of the world: "…effective statecraft is conspicuously lacking.…”
Section: The Discontents Of the Global Liberal World Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, as evidence, he cites a U.K government gloss (FCO ) of a UN report (UN ) that in fact records that crimes were being committed on all sides and that it was impossible accurately to determine responsibility for most of them. Even recently, and despite the increased opportunities meanwhile arising to learn reasons for skepticism, we find Constance Duncombe and Tim Dunne criticizing resistance to proposals of intervention on the grounds that “evidence of mass atrocities being committed in Syria is virtually uncontested” (Duncombe and Dunne , 36). The authors do not cite the sources of that evidence, however, simply asserting that it is “virtually uncontested,” in a context where China, Russia, and member states of the Nonaligned Movement contest it, leaves uncertain the standard of proof that might settle the contest.…”
Section: Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%