2008
DOI: 10.1108/09604520810898866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After‐sales service quality as an antecedent of customer satisfaction

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of after‐sales services on customers' satisfaction as well as on their behavioural intentions, namely “repurchase intention” and “word‐of‐mouth” (WOM).Design/methodology/approachThe research conducted followed a quantitative methodology. The selected research tool was a questionnaire, which was administered via phone interviews using the CATI process. The study conducted was targeted to customers of a large retail chain marketing electrical applianc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
60
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesized structural equation modeling was tested using SPSS AMOS 18. Results are shown on Rigopoulou et al, (2008), who found that service quality has a significant impact on satisfaction. H2: Service Quality positively influences Trust (γ 12 =0.37, p<0.001).…”
Section: Hypotheses Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesized structural equation modeling was tested using SPSS AMOS 18. Results are shown on Rigopoulou et al, (2008), who found that service quality has a significant impact on satisfaction. H2: Service Quality positively influences Trust (γ 12 =0.37, p<0.001).…”
Section: Hypotheses Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 Yet the fi eld research was designed in a way that minimized this inherent diffi culty. In this study, the respondents were only reached by direct calling or by email.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causal relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction is the subject of great academic debate and no unanimity has yet been reached (Bahia et al, 2000). The researches have also specified customer satisfaction as a function of perceived quality and disconfirmation-the extent to which perceived quality fails to match prepurchase expectations (Olsen, 2002;Gustafsson, Johnson, & Roos, 2005;Rigopoulou, Chaniotakis, Lymperopoulos, & Siomkos, 2008;Cerri, 2012;Kitapci et al, 2013). It has also been found that their purchase intention is more affected by quality which falls short of expectations, rather than the one which exceeds expectations (Anderson & Sullivan, 1993).…”
Section: Customer Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%