2013
DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2014.859286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘After the break’: re-conceptualizing ethnicity, national identity and ‘Malaysian-Chinese’ identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also in a concordance of other previous studies (Gabriel, 2014;Harding, 2006), where in the knowledge production, it always rooted with power. Therefore, the dominant discourses are presented as the true reality, elucidating the important facts, which is significantly important to the Sarawak natives, lay the seeds of the 'othering' discourses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is also in a concordance of other previous studies (Gabriel, 2014;Harding, 2006), where in the knowledge production, it always rooted with power. Therefore, the dominant discourses are presented as the true reality, elucidating the important facts, which is significantly important to the Sarawak natives, lay the seeds of the 'othering' discourses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The British colonial authorities occupying Malaya were responsible for creating social constructs including racial categories such as the 'Malay', 'Indian', or 'Chinese' (Hirschman, 1986;in Sharmani, 2013). The notion of 'Chineseness' was also such a colonial-orientalist social construction based on place of origin and dialect groups (Shamsul, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of 'Chineseness' was also such a colonial-orientalist social construction based on place of origin and dialect groups (Shamsul, 1999). The British colonial administrators simplified their classification of what was essentially a complex network of identification based on attributes such as dialect group, occupation, class, gender and village (Carstens, 2005;in Sharmani, 2013). Thus, the concept of race, and further on, 'Chineseness', can be said to have been a lumping together of people based on certain perceived social factual similarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Malaysia the picture is much more complicated: more recent immigrants find themselves at the bottom of a complex hierarchy of racialised belonging, in which those of Malay ethnicity are at the top, granted special rights as bumiputera or 'sons of the soil' (Lee 2004, 126-127). Citizenship does not, in and of itself, guarantee equal rights, and whereas Malays are considered 'organically Malaysian', those of Chinese and Indian descent find their status tainted by the historical immigrations of their communities (Gabriel 2014(Gabriel , 1215. In Sabah, these racialised dynamics of differentiated citizenship are further complicated by the existence of non-Malay and non-Muslim 'natives' who feel they are 'second-class bumiputera' in comparison with Muslim bumiputera (Chin 1999, 26).…”
Section: Sabah's Impossible Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%