1972
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

After the ‘Shake-Out’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again the weight of the evidence points to a fairly solid conclusionthat downward movements in occupational status are dominant, although a considerable amount of upward mobility is also observed. The studies of Daniel (1972), Herron (1975), MacKay (1972, Wedderburn (1965), Wilcock and Franke (1963), Hammerman (1964), Foltman (1968), and Deery and coworkers (1968), all support this general contention. The likelihood of occupational downgrading, not unexpectedly, increases with the amount of time spent in unemployment as the displaced workers increase their willingness to accept changes in their occupation (Gutteridge 1978).…”
Section: Job Searchmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again the weight of the evidence points to a fairly solid conclusionthat downward movements in occupational status are dominant, although a considerable amount of upward mobility is also observed. The studies of Daniel (1972), Herron (1975), MacKay (1972, Wedderburn (1965), Wilcock and Franke (1963), Hammerman (1964), Foltman (1968), and Deery and coworkers (1968), all support this general contention. The likelihood of occupational downgrading, not unexpectedly, increases with the amount of time spent in unemployment as the displaced workers increase their willingness to accept changes in their occupation (Gutteridge 1978).…”
Section: Job Searchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a consequence, it can be expected that the earnings loss will be eroded over time. MacKay (1972) pays particular attention to this when he distinguishes between 'job stickers' and 'job snatchers'. 'Job snatchers' will look for any job as a stop-gap measure after redundancy to minimize the period over which income loss occurs, and will then search for other jobs offering better conditions, better pay, and which make more use of their relevant skills.…”
Section: Job Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Mackay (1972) has suggested an interesting hypothesis with respect to job search strategy which, if further supported, would shed additional light on the behaviour of job searchers. According to this hypothesis, some job searchers, called «stickers», will accept relatively long periods of unemployment after lay-off in order to find a job comparable to the one previously held in terms of wage and stability of employment.…”
Section: Commentaires Job Search and Wage Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, other variables can also be introduced to represent these costs. It has been reported that workers recently hired are more likely to quit (Mackay (1972)). Presumably this is because, having recently searched, information is better and hence search costs are lower for these workers.…”
Section: The Quit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%