2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ag/AgO nanoparticles: Green synthesis and investigation of their bacterial inhibition effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tauc’s plot was drawn to compute the optical band gap of leaf and fruit-mediated nanosized particles by applying the equation ( α h ν ) 1 / n = A .25em ( h ν E g ) wherein α denotes the coefficient of absorption, h ν denotes photon energy, A is taken as a proportionality constant, E g represents the energy of the optical band gap, and n represents electronic transitions, wherein n = 1/2 shows the direct optical band gap transitions. Moreover, the (α h ν) versus E g graph, as displayed in Figure c, d, suggests the optical direct bandgap energy of AgNPs as 2.58 and 2.12 eV utilizing leaf extract (see Figure c) and fruit-pulp extract (see Figure d), respectively: these energies are compatible with the values in the existing literature, which are 2.9 and 3.4 eV . The difference in the optical band gap energy values may be observed due to other phenomena, such as quantum confinement effects …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tauc’s plot was drawn to compute the optical band gap of leaf and fruit-mediated nanosized particles by applying the equation ( α h ν ) 1 / n = A .25em ( h ν E g ) wherein α denotes the coefficient of absorption, h ν denotes photon energy, A is taken as a proportionality constant, E g represents the energy of the optical band gap, and n represents electronic transitions, wherein n = 1/2 shows the direct optical band gap transitions. Moreover, the (α h ν) versus E g graph, as displayed in Figure c, d, suggests the optical direct bandgap energy of AgNPs as 2.58 and 2.12 eV utilizing leaf extract (see Figure c) and fruit-pulp extract (see Figure d), respectively: these energies are compatible with the values in the existing literature, which are 2.9 and 3.4 eV . The difference in the optical band gap energy values may be observed due to other phenomena, such as quantum confinement effects …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, the (αhν) 2 versus E g graph, as displayed in Figure 6c, d, suggests the optical direct bandgap energy of AgNPs as 2.58 and 2.12 eV utilizing leaf extract (see Figure 6c) and fruit-pulp extract (see Figure 6d), respectively: these energies are compatible with the values in the existing literature, which are 2.9 46 and 3.4 eV. 47 The difference in the optical band gap energy values may be observed due to other phenomena, such as quantum confinement effects. 48…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…where α represents the absorption coefficient, hν is the photon energy, A is a constant, and E g is the optical bandgap energy, respectively, while n depends on electron transitions, and n = 2 corresponds to direct electron transitions with a direct optical bandgap. The graph between (αhν) 2 and E g , as shown in Figure 5c,d, estimates the optical bandgap energy of synthesized AgNPs as 2.97 eV and 2.88 eV using leaf (Figure 5c) and fruit extracts (Figure 5d), respectively, which are comparable with existing literature at 2.9 eV [47], and 3.4 eV [48]. These results are more significant, and minor variations in the optical bandgap may be attributable to quantum confinement effects [49].…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopy Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The findings indicated that the coordination between them possibly reduced the crystallinity of the PAN fiber, while a crystalline AO-PAN silver complex was formed concurrently on the PAN fiber surface. More importantly, three peaks located at 32.32°, 46.15°, and 57.39° were similar to the characteristic peaks of AgO, , suggesting that the crystal structure of the obtained Ag-AO-PAN was partially similar to that of the AgO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%