1951
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1951.tb05167.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Again: ‘The New Morphology’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 tively states not only that "les Angiospermes sont derive'es directement des Rhyniales devonienines," but also (supposedly on the basis of their external morphology) that "les organes reproducteurs des Angiospermes, e'tamine et piece feinelle, rep'isentent assurement les parties le plus conservatrices de tout le corps de ces vegetaux." As partial proof for this thesis Bertrand cites examples of "remnants of ancient dichotomies" in stamens of Carpinus, Ulmus, and Myrica, apparently ignoring the fact that various authors (for complete references see Puri, 1951, andEames, 1950) have clearly and conclusivelv shown that the members of the Amentiferae are highly evolved in all organs. Furthermore, it has previously been emphasized (Bailey and Howard, 1941;Bailey, 1951;Tippo, 1946Tippo, , 1950 that intensive morphological and anatomical studies of many angiosperm families have demonstrated that no one organ or part of the plant is to be regarded as any more conservative than any other.…”
Section: Primarily Duementioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 tively states not only that "les Angiospermes sont derive'es directement des Rhyniales devonienines," but also (supposedly on the basis of their external morphology) that "les organes reproducteurs des Angiospermes, e'tamine et piece feinelle, rep'isentent assurement les parties le plus conservatrices de tout le corps de ces vegetaux." As partial proof for this thesis Bertrand cites examples of "remnants of ancient dichotomies" in stamens of Carpinus, Ulmus, and Myrica, apparently ignoring the fact that various authors (for complete references see Puri, 1951, andEames, 1950) have clearly and conclusivelv shown that the members of the Amentiferae are highly evolved in all organs. Furthermore, it has previously been emphasized (Bailey and Howard, 1941;Bailey, 1951;Tippo, 1946Tippo, , 1950 that intensive morphological and anatomical studies of many angiosperm families have demonstrated that no one organ or part of the plant is to be regarded as any more conservative than any other.…”
Section: Primarily Duementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In angiosperms, each carpel is generally vascularized by three bundles: one follows along its median plane, called dorsal or median bundle; and the other two continue along its margins, called lateral or ventral bundles (e.g., Eames, 1931; Eames, 1951; Puri, 1951; Eyde, 1971; Eyde, 1975; Endress, 1994; Leins & Erbar, 2010). This pattern of carpellary vasculature may vary with lateral or additional bundles described in many taxa, as basal angiosperms (e.g., Igersheim & Endress, 1998), some monocots as Acorales (e.g., Buzgo & Endress, 2000), Alismatales (e.g., Igersheim, Buzgo & Endress, 2000; Remizowa et al, 2011), Commelinales (e.g., Hardy & Stevenson, 2000; Hardy, Stevenson & Kiss, 2000), Poales (e.g., Remizowa et al, 2012; Reynders et al, 2012) and Zingiberales (e.g., Box & Rudall, 2006), and also amongst eudicots (e.g., Litt & Stevenson, 2003; Nuraliev, Sokoloff & Oskolski, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of vascular anatomy study in Primulaceae, Douglas ( 1936 ) also thought the placenta to be carpellary in this family. However, in Eames' opinion ( 1951 ), there were not only normally oriented bundles but also inverted ones in the placenta of Portulacaceae and Primulaceae, the two genera of the Caryophyllaceae, so that the placenta was composed of both axile and carpellary tissues, whereas in cases of only inverted bundles were present the placenta was entirely carpellary. In another study it was described that the placenta of Dianthus was presumed to be fused carpel tissue because the central placental vascular strand in Dianthus represented fused ventral carpellary traces (Thomson, 1942 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%