2002
DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.15726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Against all odds: poor people jumping scales and the genesis of an urban policy in Flanders, Belgium

Abstract: Revue belge de géographie 3 | 2002 Governance and geography Against all odds: poor people jumping scales and the genesis of an urban policy in Flanders, Belgium De schaalsprong van de armen en de onverhoopte ontwikkeling van een stedelijk beleid in Vlaanderen Contre toute attente : changement d'échelle pour les défavorisés et émergence d'une politique urbaine en Flandre (Belgique)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extreme right party Vlaams Blok (now called Vlaams Belang) achieved its first major electoral victories in these areas. Flanders’ political establishment was shocked into action and funded local actors, in particular welfare agencies, to engage in civil renewal — by funding neighborhood centers, job programs and community initiatives, the government hoped to change the conditions giving rise to the Vlaams Blok (Loopmans et al ., ). When, in the late 1990s, the Vlaams Blok also had considerable success outside the urban core, urban policy shifted gears: while initially the focus was on strengthening social cohesion and emancipation of disenfranchised groups, since the late 1990s the government is, at least rhetorically, more committed to integrated neighborhood development, including the promotion of gentrification (Loopmans et al ., ).…”
Section: Urban Policy and The Integrity Of The Nation: The Netherlandmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The extreme right party Vlaams Blok (now called Vlaams Belang) achieved its first major electoral victories in these areas. Flanders’ political establishment was shocked into action and funded local actors, in particular welfare agencies, to engage in civil renewal — by funding neighborhood centers, job programs and community initiatives, the government hoped to change the conditions giving rise to the Vlaams Blok (Loopmans et al ., ). When, in the late 1990s, the Vlaams Blok also had considerable success outside the urban core, urban policy shifted gears: while initially the focus was on strengthening social cohesion and emancipation of disenfranchised groups, since the late 1990s the government is, at least rhetorically, more committed to integrated neighborhood development, including the promotion of gentrification (Loopmans et al ., ).…”
Section: Urban Policy and The Integrity Of The Nation: The Netherlandmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, for a full understanding of regional urbanisation politics, it will be necessary to also provide a picture of the practices of the largest Flemish cities Antwerp and Ghent. Indeed, political as well as institutional links between those two cities and the regional government have created a situation where social and political developments in these cities have had a serious impact upon policy formulation at the regional level (see Loopmans et al, 2002).…”
Section: Gramsci Hegemony and Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaining strength with each election, the Vlaams Blok turned the 'immigrant question' into a major urban problem, thereby indirectly challenging the dominant mode of urban development that had resulted in inner-city immigrant concentration. Faced with such a potentially disruptive mobilisation and electoral threat, government parties felt forced to react (Loopmans et al, 2002;. First, the federal government installed a Royal Commissioner to investigate the immigrant question.…”
Section: Addressing the Immigrant Question Through Neighbourhood Ethnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This Fund was an explicit reaction against the electoral rise of the extreme-right party, the Vlaams Blok (see Loopmans et al 2003;De Decker et al 2005). The electoral success of this party was linked by social scientists and political analysts to a range of 'minor' issues that provoked discontent among residents of deprived neighbourhoods, such as street litter, feelings of anomy, intercultural conflicts, vandalism and petty crime.…”
Section: The Opsinjoren Rationale: Together For a Liveable Citymentioning
confidence: 99%