Drawing on the figurational sociology of Norbert Elias and the Foucauldian governmentality approach, this article outlines the political rationalities and governmental technologies pertaining to the territorial governance of urban marginality in Western Europe. Whereas many authors have suggested that segregation is key to the governing of urban marginality in the USA and perhaps the post-industrial city generally, I suggest that, at least in Western Europe, marginality is governed through integration.
The argument is illustrated with examples from the UK, the Netherlands and Belgium.During the decades after the second world war, the state and its guardians could view and frame the challenges to their authority in deprived neighborhoods as expressions of residual social problems which would disappear as the welfare state expanded and urban renewal proceeded. William H. Whyte (1956: 67) captured the mood in his The Organization Man: 'The big questions are all settled; we know the direction, and while many minor details remain to be cleared up, we can be pretty sure of enjoying a wonderful upward rise'.The modernistic renewal plans of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s exemplified the ambition to achieve order by design. Any remaining deprivation or deviation could be seen as the residue of a bygone era, soon to be swept away.The onslaught of neoliberalism has changed this situation as the prospect of resolving marginality through social and employment policies has become increasingly unrealistic. Contemporary urban marginality is not residual but 'advanced'. Advanced marginality results from 'a macrosocietal drift towards inequality, the mutation of wage labour (entailing both deproletarianisation and casualisation), the retrenchment of welfare states, and the spatial concentration and stigmatisation of poverty' (Wacquant, 1999(Wacquant, : 1639. Advanced marginality represents a daily burden for its immediate victims but this article's premise is that it also poses problems for governance actors. As neighborhoods degenerate into zones of relegation, the state's monopoly over symbolic and physical violence (Bourdieu, 2000: 186) is increasingly challenged. Recent large-scale rebellions in the UK and France spectacularly demonstrate the state's inability to enlist consent or enforce order in deprived areas. The failure to properly govern also expresses itself in a myriad of other, more mundane ways -when people shrug as they hear politicians speak, when teachers cannot make their pupils listen to them, when youth claim public spaces, when trash litters the streets or when welfare agencies fail to process their case loads. In everyday conversations and media reports, the government is questioned as it fails to deliver on the promise of defending order, setting into motion a continuous search I would like to thank Neil Brenner, Walter Nicholls, Bahar Sakizlioglu, Loïc Wacquant and the IJURR referees for their comments on earlier drafts of this article. bs_bs_banner