2017
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2017.1301913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Against ‘teaching excellence’: ideology, commodification, and enabling the neoliberalization of postsecondary education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our findings have indicated that excellence in the context of our teaching innovation is more complex and is likely to be perceived differently not only by staff and students but also amongst students depending on their level of sophistication as learners. In the scope of this discussion, we assume that terms including 'excellent teaching', 'teaching excellence' or even 'excelling in teaching' as set out by Saunders and Blanco Ramirez (2017) are synonymous with an excellent teaching experience for students resulting in learning. As a result, we focus on the implications of differing perceptions of excellence for both designing and evaluating pedagogical innovation in the current context of metrics-driven TEF ratings rather than further attempting to define excellence per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our findings have indicated that excellence in the context of our teaching innovation is more complex and is likely to be perceived differently not only by staff and students but also amongst students depending on their level of sophistication as learners. In the scope of this discussion, we assume that terms including 'excellent teaching', 'teaching excellence' or even 'excelling in teaching' as set out by Saunders and Blanco Ramirez (2017) are synonymous with an excellent teaching experience for students resulting in learning. As a result, we focus on the implications of differing perceptions of excellence for both designing and evaluating pedagogical innovation in the current context of metrics-driven TEF ratings rather than further attempting to define excellence per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is intrinsic tension around constructions of teaching excellence embedded in individual perceptions of the tangible and intangible aspects of education. In the TEF environment where attention is focused on measurable metrics for comparison, overall excellence is likely to be eroded as the intangible elements of higher education are overlooked in a competitive market system relying on the commodification of education (Saunders & Blanco-Ramirez, 2017). Furthermore, by measuring institutional quality through TEF metrics such as the National Student Survey, teachers are likely to become risk averse and unwilling to introduce any elements into their teaching which may adversely affect their own professional or institutional ratings (Gibbs 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contested political b and ballooning student debt unsettle social mobility pre more online or blended delivery. Another is sharper busin [5]. Notwithstanding competitive pressures or technolog psychology, social structure, culture, built and instituti factors would improve learning outcomes, optimize the facilitate communication between different cultures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, like Saunders and Blanco Ramirez (2017), they raise questions about the extent to which 'excellence' can be seen as a generic measure, in this case in a postcolonial context characterised by social injustice. They argue that teaching excellence must contribute to the transformation of society and inclusivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Writing from a US perspective, in the first article in the issue Saunders and Blanco Ramirez (2017) point out the prevalence of claims of excellence in higher education, and the manner in which this construct is presented as an a priori ideal. They remind us that a concept such as 'excellence' requires measurement, leading to fragmentation of the complex into the discrete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%