2022
DOI: 10.4000/quaternaire.16948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agama bibronii (Sauria : Agamidae) et chamaeleo chamaeleon (Sauria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, their fossil record is rather scarce—the majority of chameleon fossil remains consist of isolated and often fragmentary cranial elements; nevertheless, spectacularly preserved specimens have also been documented (Hillenius, 1978; Čerňanský et al, 2020). This poor fossil record is confined solely to the Lower and Middle Miocene of Central and southeastern Europe, Africa, and perhaps India, the Pliocene of southern Africa, and the Quaternary of southwestern Europe, the Middle East, northern Africa, and Madagascar (Hillenius, 1978; Moody & Rocěk, 1980; Estes, 1983; Fejfar & Schleich, 1994; Aouraghe et al, 2010; Čerňanský, 2010; Maul et al, 2011; Dollion et al, 2015; Georgalis et al, 2016; Sankhyan & Čerňanský, 2016; Smith et al, 2016; Čerňanský et al, 2020; Mouhsine et al, 2022). A purported chameleon specimen from the Cretaceous amber deposits of Myanmar (Daza et al, 2016) has since been subsequently shown to represent instead an albanerpetontid amphibian (Daza et al, 2020), while supposed referral of Paleogene forms (e.g., Palaeochamaeleo De Stefano, 1903, and Anqingosaurus Hou, 1976) to chamaeleonids has since been rejected as pertaining to other lizard clades (e.g., Rage & Augé, 2015; Dong et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, their fossil record is rather scarce—the majority of chameleon fossil remains consist of isolated and often fragmentary cranial elements; nevertheless, spectacularly preserved specimens have also been documented (Hillenius, 1978; Čerňanský et al, 2020). This poor fossil record is confined solely to the Lower and Middle Miocene of Central and southeastern Europe, Africa, and perhaps India, the Pliocene of southern Africa, and the Quaternary of southwestern Europe, the Middle East, northern Africa, and Madagascar (Hillenius, 1978; Moody & Rocěk, 1980; Estes, 1983; Fejfar & Schleich, 1994; Aouraghe et al, 2010; Čerňanský, 2010; Maul et al, 2011; Dollion et al, 2015; Georgalis et al, 2016; Sankhyan & Čerňanský, 2016; Smith et al, 2016; Čerňanský et al, 2020; Mouhsine et al, 2022). A purported chameleon specimen from the Cretaceous amber deposits of Myanmar (Daza et al, 2016) has since been subsequently shown to represent instead an albanerpetontid amphibian (Daza et al, 2020), while supposed referral of Paleogene forms (e.g., Palaeochamaeleo De Stefano, 1903, and Anqingosaurus Hou, 1976) to chamaeleonids has since been rejected as pertaining to other lizard clades (e.g., Rage & Augé, 2015; Dong et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%