2002
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m202969200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AGAP1, an Endosome-associated, Phosphoinositide-dependent ADP-ribosylation Factor GTPase-activating Protein That Affects Actin Cytoskeleton

Abstract: We have identified three members of the AGAP subfamily of ASAP family ADP-ribosylation factor GTPaseactivating proteins (Arf GAPs). In addition to the Arf GAP domain, these proteins contain GTP-binding protein-like, ankyrin repeat and pleckstrin homology domains. Here, we have characterized the ubiquitously expressed AGAP1/KIAA1099. AGAP1 had Arf GAP activity toward Arf1>Arf5>Arf6. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and phosphatidic acid synergistically stimulated GAP activity. As found for other ASAP famil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
117
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8C; Koizumi et al, 2005). The partial localization of AGD1 to FM4-64-labeled bodies that we observed here is consistent with the endosomal localization of the closely related animal AZAPs (Jackson et al, 2000;Nie et al, 2002). The differences in localization, domain organization, and possibly ARF substrate preference between AGD1 and AGD10 could likely explain the different nature of tip growth defects caused by their respective mutants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8C; Koizumi et al, 2005). The partial localization of AGD1 to FM4-64-labeled bodies that we observed here is consistent with the endosomal localization of the closely related animal AZAPs (Jackson et al, 2000;Nie et al, 2002). The differences in localization, domain organization, and possibly ARF substrate preference between AGD1 and AGD10 could likely explain the different nature of tip growth defects caused by their respective mutants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In animal cells, AZAP-type ARF-GAPs, by virtue of their effects on membrane trafficking, induce a remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton (Nie et al, 2002;Randazzo and Hirsch, 2004;Randazzo et al, 2007). Modification in membrane structure by AZAP has been shown to be mediated in part by the BAR domain at the N terminus of the protein (Nie et al, 2006) and has been proposed to facilitate the binding of other classes of small GTPases (Habermann, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FG repeats in nucleoporins are believed to mediate protein-protein interactions, and in the case of hRIP, are required for its interaction with Rev in vivo. At its N terminus, hRIP contains a zinc finger motif (Krishna et al 2003), which shares a high degree of sequence identity with a subclass of C 4 H 2 -type zinc-finger domains found in proteins involved in vesicular trafficking, intracellular protein localization, cytoskeletal rearrangement, RNA metabolism, or signal transduction (Cukierman et al 1995;Kirchhausen 2000;Premont et al 2000;Turner et al 2001;Nie et al 2002;Dubois et al 2003). Within the central body of the protein are stretches of serine/threonine-rich sequences (S/TRR), several of which are substrates for a subset of cellular kinases, and thus, possible targets for regulation (Maraldi et al 1999;Parker and Parkinson 2001;Biondi and Nebreda 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, phosphatidylinositols bind the PH domain of dynamin and activate its GTPase activity, which is important in dynamin function during vesicle budding (6). Phosphoinositides can convert Arf-GTP into Arf-GDP by binding to PH domain of centaurin ␤ family of Arf-GAPs, including ASAP1 and 2 (7)(8)(9). PIKE-A contains a PH domain, which separates the N-terminal GTPase and C-terminal Arf-GAP domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%