Departments: 1999 to 2020." Like with many programs and initiatives, PHAB is often asked about the relationship between health outcomes and accreditation. Indeed, PHAB's logic model has always included improvement in community health indicators as an ultimate outcome. 2 Although focused mostly on proximate and intermediate outcomes related to performance improvement and organizational and systems change, PHAB's rationale for community health indicators as an ultimate outcome is that a health department that works with its community to develop a solid community health improvement plan, that tracks and monitors its ongoing community/stakeholder relationships, and that bases its work on evidence will positively contribute to improving the health of its jurisdiction. To strengthen this link and gather information, PHAB has recently added the monitoring and reporting of a limited number of health department selected population outcomes to the reaccreditation requirements. Cleaning and analysis of these data will start soon, providing an important addition of information to address this issue. 3 At the same time, PHAB has been cautious about correlating accreditation to health outcomes because PHAB believes strongly in a multiple determinants of health model. As outlined in models such as County