Age-aggregation bias in mortality trends

Abstract

In PNAS, Case and Deaton (1) show a figure illustrating the "marked increase in the all-cause mortality of middle-aged white non-Hispanic men and women in the United States between 1999 and 2013." The authors state that their numbers "are not age-adjusted within the 10-y 45-54 age group" (1).We suspected an aggregation bias and examined whether the increase in aggregate mortality rates could be due to the changing composition of this age group. Adjusting for age confirmed this suspicion. Contrary to Case and Deaton's figure (1), we find there is not a steady increase in mortality rates for this age group. Instead there is an increasing trend from 1999 to 2005 and a constant trend thereafter. Moreover, stratifying age-adjusted mortality rates by sex shows a marked increase only for women and not men, contrary to the article's headline.Age-adjustment is not merely an academic exercise. Fig. 1A shows the unadjusted mortality rates over the 1999-2013 time period. During this period, however, the average age in this group increased as the baby boom generation passed through (Fig. 1B).We calculated the change in the group mortality rate due solely to the change in the underlying age of the population. We took the 2013 mortality rates for each age and computed a weighted average rate each year using the number of individuals in each age group. Fig, 1C shows that the changing composition in age alone explains about half the change in the mortality rate of this group since 1999 and all of the change since 2005.We then age-adjusted the mortality rates published in the Case and Deaton paper (1). Fig. 2A shows adjustment to a uniform age distribution over ages 45-54, where the mortality rate is calculated each year by dividing the number of deaths for each age between 45 and 54 by the population of that age and then taking the average. Consistent with Fig. 1C, the adjusted mortality rate increased from 1999 to 2005 and then stopped.We find that age-adjustment is not sensitive to the age distribution used to normalize the mortality rates. Fig. 2B shows three adjustments: first, under the aforementioned uniform age distribution; second, using the distribution of ages that existed in 1999, which is skewed toward the younger end of the 45-54 group; and third, using the 2013 age distribution, which is skewed older. The general pattern does not change.Calculating the age-adjusted rates separately for each sex reveals a crucial result (Fig. 2C). The mortality rate among women increased markedly, but the corresponding group of men nearly reversed its 1999-2005 increase over the 2005-2013 period.We stress that this does not change a key finding of the Case and Deaton paper (1): the comparison of nonHispanic United States middle-aged whites to other populations. It affects claims concerning the absolute increase in mortality among United States middleaged white non-Hispanics. We believe it is vital that future researchers understand the aggregation bias as they read Case and Deaton's article and consider how to investigate these note...

The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014

“…Case and Deaton 34 and Gelman and Auerbach 35 also showed that age-adjusted mortality rates for white men aged 45 to 54 years were constant or increasing during the 2000s. Our finding of increasing life expectancy across most income groups differs from this result because our estimates incorporate declines in mortality rates at older ages, pool all races, and exclude individuals with 0 earnings at the age of 40 years.…”

America’s Declining Well-Being, Health, and Life Expectancy: Not Just a White Problem

“…Since publication of the original Case and Deaton report, efforts have been made to specify how the patterns observed vary across race, age, and gender. 18,19 When one looks at the big picture—with data spanning decades—we see that suicide rates are barely higher than they were in 1980 (Figure 1). We also see that deaths from alcoholic cirrhosis have increased only mildly since then.…”

Swing Voting in the 2016 Presidential Election in Counties Where Midlife Mortality has been Rising in White Non-Hispanic Americans

“…To avoid suppressed death counts due to low numbers we pooled 7 year estimates: the first period includes data from 1999 to 2005 while the second period spans from 2009 to 2015 To address potential age-aggregation bias (Gelman and Auerbach, 2016) we averaged mortality rates in people aged 45-49 and 50-54 to create an ageadjusted mortality rate for people aged 45-54. To estimate increases in mortality by county, we subtracted the mortality rate in the first period (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005) from the rate in the second period (2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015).…”