2008
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.12.8322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and Comorbidity As Independent Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trials

Abstract: In these large, randomized trials, the presence of comorbid conditions (CCIS > or = 1), rather than age more than 65 years, was associated with poorer survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
197
4
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
197
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for differences in comorbidity factors rates may be these previous studies include for the mostpart, patientswith early stage (Stage I-III) NSCLC. [16][17][18] The prevalance of diabetes in our study was higher than that was found in similar, previous studies in the literature. There are conflicting data about the relationship between diabetes and incidence of NSCLC in the literature so that it is not possible to make a precise conclusion about this subject at this time.…”
Section: Cumulative Survivalcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The reason for differences in comorbidity factors rates may be these previous studies include for the mostpart, patientswith early stage (Stage I-III) NSCLC. [16][17][18] The prevalance of diabetes in our study was higher than that was found in similar, previous studies in the literature. There are conflicting data about the relationship between diabetes and incidence of NSCLC in the literature so that it is not possible to make a precise conclusion about this subject at this time.…”
Section: Cumulative Survivalcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Smoking status was demonstrated in previous reports to be an important prognostic factor due to its influence on overall survival (OS) regardless of the treatment received [7] . Histology [8,9] , co-morbidity using the Charlson score [10] and admission performance status [11] also have an impact on OS and patient outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a potential positive selection bias could be considered, because HDCT has been administered to patients with good performance status and without comorbidity. 16 These results suggest that as with other diseases, sensitivity to standard doses of treatment is an important prognostic factor that can be used for predicting benefit from intensive therapy. If this approach were to be explored in future trials, then subsequent treatment with HDC should be limited to those patients achieving a significant response to induction therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%