Archaean Geochemistry 1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-70001-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and Evolution of the Early Precambrian Continental Crust of the Ukrainian Shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a case, the data points of errorchrons strongly deviate from the ideal isochron, with a wide range of possible depositional ages. However, the published metamorphic U-Pb age for granitoid emplacement and regional metamorphism is 2.0 Ga ± 100 Ma (Shcherbak et al, 1984), which is considerably younger than the age suggested by our errorchron, which in turn is similar to the published formation age within the 2 error range. (ii) The BIF samples were affected by different amounts of detrital contamination which strongly affects their specific isotopic compositions.…”
Section: Samarium-neodymium Isotope Geochronologysupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such a case, the data points of errorchrons strongly deviate from the ideal isochron, with a wide range of possible depositional ages. However, the published metamorphic U-Pb age for granitoid emplacement and regional metamorphism is 2.0 Ga ± 100 Ma (Shcherbak et al, 1984), which is considerably younger than the age suggested by our errorchron, which in turn is similar to the published formation age within the 2 error range. (ii) The BIF samples were affected by different amounts of detrital contamination which strongly affects their specific isotopic compositions.…”
Section: Samarium-neodymium Isotope Geochronologysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The Fe content of the lower sequences is less than 40%, while upper Saxagan Group BIF horizons may contain up to 65% Fe (Mboudou et al, 2012), probably triggered by post-depositional supergene Fe-ore upgrade. Mboudou et al (2012) and Belevtsev and Belyaev (1989) report greenschist facies metamorphic conditions in the lower part of the Saxagan BIF stratigraphy which increase to amphibolite facies in the upper part of the sequence and are probably related to a Kulik and Korzhnev, 1997). regional granitoid emplacement at 2000 ± 100 Ma (Shcherbak et al, 1984). However, all BIF samples we studied are mainly composed of magnetite and quartz with minor siderite, hematite and low-grade metamorphic trace minerals such as riebeckite, cummingtonite, stilpnomelane and chlorite minerals.…”
Section: Geological Overviewmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The obtained results (695 ± 20 °C, 5 kbar) correspond to the data of Savko (1999a) for the VCM and also characterize one of the retrograde metamorphic events. Absolute age data for the Azov Block (Shcherbak et al. , 1984, 1993) have identified three tectono‐thermal (metamorphic) events with the ages of 3.45, 2.9–2.8 and 2.3–2.2 Ga, which agrees with the multistage character of metamorphism of the VCM BIF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Fe-rich and Si-rich banded chemical sediments alternate with clastic sedimentary units that were deposited during cycles of transgression and regression periods of the Krivoy Rog sea (Kulik et al, 1991). The depositional age of the chemo-clastic Krivoy Rog Supergroup was bracketed between 2.7 and 2.0 Ga (Shcherbak et al, 1984;1989)…”
Section: Geological Overview Of the Neoarchean Krivoy Rog Bifmentioning
confidence: 99%