In recent years, vein-based biometric recognition has received ever-increasing attention from both academia and industry, due to the advantages it offers over traditional biometric traits such as fingerprint, iris, and face. Nonetheless, some issues related to the use of vein biometrics still need to be investigated and understood. Specifically, in this study, we speculate about the gender-related variations in vein patterns, and their effects on biometric verification performance. An analysis on the feasibility of recognizing male and female subjects depending on their hand-vein patterns, and on the level of similarity characterizing the biometric templates extracted from male and female populations, are here carried out considering three different databases. Specifically, the public VERA dataset, containing samples of palm-vein patterns, and two datasets containing images of finger-vein patterns, i.e., the UTFVP public database, and an in-house dataset collected with an on-the-move contactless modality, are here considered. The obtained experimental results show that the approach here proposed to perform gender recognition allows to reach an accuracy up to 95.83% on the public finger-vein UTFVP dataset, and to outperform the current state-of-the-art on the public palm-vein VERA dataset, with accuracy at 93.55%. It is also shown that vein-based biometric systems can benefit from the exploitation of information regarding the gender of the considered subjects, with achievable recognition rates that can be significantly improved by designing a biometric verification system relying on gender-specific models for extracting the employed discriminative templates.INDEX TERMS Biometric recognition, gender recognition, vein biometrics, deep learning.
I. INTRODUCTIONBiometric technologies are nowadays widely adopted in several applications dedicated to human recognition and identity management. A biometric system collects and exploits physical, behavioural, or cognitive traits, characterized by properties such as universality, uniqueness, permanence, measurability, performance, acceptability, and robustness to circumvention, to generate a set of discriminative features employed as user's identifiers. In the recognition phase, the features extracted from the biometric probe are comparedThe associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Zahid Akhtar .